As far as Boris Johnson is concerned the Cumming's affair is over and no matter what the vast majority of the population think he can't or won't accept that he's done wrong. In the briefing today he closed down Robert Peston's question and said he wasn't going to let the two others answer. They have very cleverly twisted the rules to suit them now saying it allows one thing when most of us read it and took it to mean another.
"for any medical reason, to donate blood, avoid injury or illness, escape risk of harm, provide care or help a vulnerable person"
I guess most of us took the "provide care or help a vulnerable person" as meaning that we could go to them to help them if needed, not that we could take a vulnerable person anywhere we liked to get care. If they had known that I expect thousands of parents, especially single ones, would have left home and taken their children elsewhere. Why was the child considered vulnerable anyway - he is in the very age group that is now being sent back to school? I find it very strange as well that there was no one at all locally they could call on for help if it had been needed. Do they have no friends?
The same with the "avoid injury or illness" So in theory, to avoid illness I could have gone to stay elsewhere in order to avoid crowded places in case I got ill?
No, we all did exactly as told and didn't look for loopholes.