Author Topic: Age a women could marry in 1750  (Read 4462 times)

Offline Redroger

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,680
  • Dad and Fireman at Kings Cross 13.7.1951
    • View Profile
Re: Age a women could marry in 1750
« Reply #9 on: Tuesday 26 November 19 14:42 GMT (UK) »
Thank you Stan , oh my goodness that’s quite shocking . I thought I must have had the wrong marriage entry .
Many thanks
G
[/quote
Don't make the mistake of judging the 18th century or earlier by today's standards. Remember that at that time life expectancy was only in the 30s. If you waited to marry you could well be dead!
Ayres Brignell Cornwell Harvey Shipp  Stimpson Stubbings (all Cambs) Baumber Baxter Burton Ethards Proctor Stanton (all Lincs) Luffman (all counties)

Offline GrahamSimons

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,154
    • View Profile
Re: Age a women could marry in 1750
« Reply #10 on: Tuesday 26 November 19 17:03 GMT (UK) »
My 3-greats grandmother was 12 or 13 when she married my 3-greats grandfather who was 49 at the time (1779).
Simons Barrett Jaffray Waugh Langdale Heugh Meade Garnsey Evans Vazie Mountcure Glascodine Parish Peard Smart Dobbie Sinclair....
in Stirlingshire, Roxburghshire; Bucks; Devon; Somerset; Northumberland; Carmarthenshire; Glamorgan

Offline gratuation

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 383
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Age a women could marry in 1750
« Reply #11 on: Tuesday 26 November 19 18:36 GMT (UK) »
I’ll know in future it was quite normal back then and thanks everyone

Offline melba_schmelba

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,854
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Age a women could marry in 1750
« Reply #12 on: Tuesday 26 November 19 19:47 GMT (UK) »
I’ll know in future it was quite normal back then and thanks everyone
I definitely wouldn't say that. In my trees of several thousand people, I have never found a marriage at that age, going back to the 1500s. The youngest I have seen is 14, and there was only one of those.


Offline stanmapstone

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,798
    • View Profile
Re: Age a women could marry in 1750
« Reply #13 on: Tuesday 26 November 19 21:41 GMT (UK) »
From "The Oxford Guide to Family History" by David Hey.
Another myth that has been firmly laid to rest by social historians is that English people used to marry when they were very young......The evidence is inconclusive for the medieval period, but the study of parish registers has left no doubt that since the sixteenth century at least England has shared the north-western European pattern of a later age at marriage.... So well established was this pattern by the beginnings of parish registration, that it is unlikely that medieval experience was much different.... Only a very small proportion of the population of Elizabethan England married before the age of 20.

Stan
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline gratuation

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 383
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Age a women could marry in 1750
« Reply #14 on: Tuesday 26 November 19 22:20 GMT (UK) »
Thanks for the information