Author Topic: field diary 1832 deciphering problems  (Read 13908 times)

Offline Karen McDonald

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,474
  • ** THINK POSITIVE! **
    • View Profile
Re: field diary 1832 deciphering problems
« Reply #144 on: Wednesday 30 October 19 08:01 GMT (UK) »
Hi,

in 52m.2 I see pe-tioned.
I wonder if he meant petitioned, but lost a couple of letters underway?!  ???

Best regards,
Karen
McDonald MacDonald M'Donald McGregor MacGregor M'Gregor Twilley Wells Fentiman Carrington Rowe Needham Mitchell Mackie Collingwood Fuller Maides Shilton Hagon Budd

Offline Rhododendron

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 670
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: field diary 1832 deciphering problems
« Reply #145 on: Wednesday 30 October 19 08:33 GMT (UK) »
I agree with Karen on 52.2.

Offline arthurk

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 5,376
    • View Profile
Re: field diary 1832 deciphering problems
« Reply #146 on: Wednesday 30 October 19 20:00 GMT (UK) »
51m.1 - stray

52m.1 - even got

Offline JanSeifert

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 197
  • NE India colonial history
    • View Profile
Re: field diary 1832 deciphering problems
« Reply #147 on: Thursday 31 October 19 15:17 GMT (UK) »
Hi,

in 52m.2 I see pe-tioned.
I wonder if he meant petitioned, but lost a couple of letters underway?!  ???

Best regards,
Karen

that would sound logical, especially at the end of a (margins) line and keeping in mind the faulty spelling of the diary, but the context is disagreement between »I« and »they«, because »they« wanted just a bit of scalp from the child to settle an old feud. »I« (Jenkins) could of course not agree to that.

so I keep it on the unsolved list for now.

But thank you anyway for your input.


Offline JanSeifert

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 197
  • NE India colonial history
    • View Profile
Re: field diary 1832 deciphering problems
« Reply #148 on: Thursday 31 October 19 15:26 GMT (UK) »
51m.1 - stray

52m.1 - even got

I would never have seen an »even« there! And »stray« is surely much better than my idea.
Thanks.

Offline JanSeifert

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 197
  • NE India colonial history
    • View Profile
Re: field diary 1832 deciphering problems
« Reply #149 on: Friday 01 November 19 06:55 GMT (UK) »
a few more problems

86.1

»
got the means of moving
with 20 Coolies & 2 double
platform canoes I left Mulong
accompanied by Mackenzie
«

or 10?


Offline JanSeifert

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 197
  • NE India colonial history
    • View Profile
Re: field diary 1832 deciphering problems
« Reply #150 on: Friday 01 November 19 06:56 GMT (UK) »
88.1

»
2 or 3 miles below Ramsah
we came to the falls & ra-
pids of the river at [??]
Jumoona, the falls are very
«


Offline JanSeifert

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 197
  • NE India colonial history
    • View Profile
Re: field diary 1832 deciphering problems
« Reply #151 on: Friday 01 November 19 06:57 GMT (UK) »
90.1

»
The country we came through
has in the ordinary routine
of Joum cultivation or in better
years been nearly all cultivated
for it was almost entirely covered
with the aftergrowth of crops
grass & brushwood. I am told
«

solved

Offline JanSeifert

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 197
  • NE India colonial history
    • View Profile
Re: field diary 1832 deciphering problems
« Reply #152 on: Friday 01 November 19 06:58 GMT (UK) »
91.1

»
We fell in to-day with a small
herd of wild Buffaloes, [??] or[??]
at which we made some ineffec-
tual shots. They were fine
«