1939 Register

[peterpiper]

Hya Peeps, needing help again!
The 1939 register has my oldies living under a different surname, which has been crossed out  and the correct family name written in , one entry has "1947 DNA M" along side it, I suppose this means DNA Match, does this mean that someone else is (or has been) researching this family?  If not, who made the alterations
Thanks for reading,
pete

[Craclyn]

Nobody would have written DNA Match on the 1939 Register. The code must have a different meaning.

[JenB]

It is most likely a district code, the date being when an event took place, affecting one of your 'oldies'.

DNA was the district code for Bagshot in Surrey. https://www.findmypast.co.uk/articles/1939-register-enumeration-districts

[peterpiper]

Thanks for the information, on looking again (with my specs on) the entry is ONA M, which is Stoke on Trent, the area I need.
I'm attaching a picture of the entry, I hope, any further info welcome.

[emeltom]

Possibly the date of a marriage in the ONA area?

Emeltom

[JenB]

I suggest that it indicates that there was a marriage in Stoke on Trent in 1946.
Have you checked this on freeBMD?

[peterpiper]

More info, Norah was married to Webb 1946, so that will be what the alteration means.
There's so much more info available since I last started researching that I'm having to learn all over again.
Thanks for reading and for replies
pete
PS. Emeltom, and JenB sorry, I was typing this when you replied, seems like the M is sorted, Thank you, but who would have altered the others?

[barryd]

I took another look at the 1939 Register for my Mother. I had not found her previously. Finally found her redacted although her younger brother is there but born seven years later. A big undertaking and mistakes happen.

[peterpiper]

Looks like piccie attachment didn't work, back to the learning
pete
PS yes it did, must be tired, can't  concentrate