Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: nancarrow  (Read 2588 times)

Offline tancor1

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 54
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
nancarrow
« on: Friday 07 June 19 17:17 BST (UK) »
i have got back to my 3times great grandfather Samuel Nancarrow born 1811 Phillack Cornwall, he married a Jane Lyons she was born 1814 Phillack but i have been unable to find her death.
They had 3  children Samuel my 2 times great grandfather and 2 daughters Mary and Margaret, i know that Samuel my 2times ggf was a copper miner and when the copper mine closed he moved to the north east of England, than i don't know when he moved to Nelson in Lancashire.
can you help with Jane's death or maybe help me go further back in generations.

Offline rosie99

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 44,171
  • ALFIE 2009 - 2021 (Rosbercon Sky's the Limit)
    • View Profile
Re: nancarrow
« Reply #1 on: Friday 07 June 19 18:02 BST (UK) »
Where do you have them in census after 1841

Is this them
1841 Phillack
HO107/143 bk12 f37 p17
Samuel Nancarrow 30   
Jane   30   
Mary   10   
Elizabeth   5   
Margarette 1   
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline osprey

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,464
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: nancarrow
« Reply #2 on: Friday 07 June 19 18:22 BST (UK) »
possible burial in Phillack
Samuel Nancarrow  aged 44 3 Sept 1849 address Guildford , same address noted on Margaret's baptism 25 April 1841
Cornwall: Allen, Bevan, Bosisto, Carnpezzack, Donithorn, Huddy, James, Retallack, Russell, Vincent, Yeoman
Cards: Thomas (Llanbadarn Fawr)
Glam: Bowler, Cram, Galloway, James, Thomas, Watkins
Lincs: Coupland, Cram
Mon: Cram, Gwyn, John, Philpot, Smart, Watkins
Pembs: Edwards (St. Dogmael's)
Yorks: Airey, Bowler, Elliott, Hare, Hewitt, Kellett, Kemp, Stephenson, Tebb

Offline osprey

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,464
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: nancarrow
« Reply #3 on: Friday 07 June 19 18:28 BST (UK) »
1851 census
Guilford, Phillack HO107/1916 folio 562 pg 2
Jane Nancarrow head widow 42 washing woman
Elizabeth dau 16 washing woman
Samuel son 7
all born Phillack
Cornwall: Allen, Bevan, Bosisto, Carnpezzack, Donithorn, Huddy, James, Retallack, Russell, Vincent, Yeoman
Cards: Thomas (Llanbadarn Fawr)
Glam: Bowler, Cram, Galloway, James, Thomas, Watkins
Lincs: Coupland, Cram
Mon: Cram, Gwyn, John, Philpot, Smart, Watkins
Pembs: Edwards (St. Dogmael's)
Yorks: Airey, Bowler, Elliott, Hare, Hewitt, Kellett, Kemp, Stephenson, Tebb

Offline osprey

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,464
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: nancarrow
« Reply #4 on: Friday 07 June 19 18:48 BST (UK) »
Samuel married Isabella Smith june qtr 1869 Guisborough vol 9d pg 653.

Jane Lyons is living with them in Brotton in 1871 RG10/4853 folio 95 pg 14


Not spotted him in 1861 so far.

 :-\
Cornwall: Allen, Bevan, Bosisto, Carnpezzack, Donithorn, Huddy, James, Retallack, Russell, Vincent, Yeoman
Cards: Thomas (Llanbadarn Fawr)
Glam: Bowler, Cram, Galloway, James, Thomas, Watkins
Lincs: Coupland, Cram
Mon: Cram, Gwyn, John, Philpot, Smart, Watkins
Pembs: Edwards (St. Dogmael's)
Yorks: Airey, Bowler, Elliott, Hare, Hewitt, Kellett, Kemp, Stephenson, Tebb

Offline keyboard86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,056
    • View Profile
Re: nancarrow
« Reply #5 on: Friday 07 June 19 18:58 BST (UK) »
Hi hoping to help:-

Samuel Nancarrow 25 occ Miner Father Samuel Nancarrow occ Miner married Isabella Smith 23 Wilton 12th May 1869
Keyboard86
Pelly/Pelley/Kingsbury/Challis/Nalder/Rochester/Raydenbow

UK Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline philipsearching

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,094
  • I was a beautiful baby - what went wrong?
    • View Profile
Re: nancarrow
« Reply #6 on: Friday 07 June 19 19:02 BST (UK) »
For Samuel NANCARROW I can find no baptisms in Phillack but there are two possible baptisms in Gwinear (4 miles from Phillack):
23 Aug 1805, Samuel NANCARROW son of Samuel & Anne
26 Apr 1806, Samuel NANCARROW son of George & Mary

I couldn't see any burials around Gwinear or Phillack for a young Samuel, so I don't know if either of these are your man or how to determine which one.  Either of them could be the right sort of age for the 1849 burial found by osprey.
Please help me to help you by citing sources for information.

Census information is Crown Copyright http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline osprey

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,464
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: nancarrow
« Reply #7 on: Friday 07 June 19 19:16 BST (UK) »
the birth registrations for Margaret in 1841 and Samuel in 1854 have a mmn that is a variation of Chegwin/Chirgwen so marriage in Phillack 30 Sept 1826 for Samuel Nekerro sojourner and Jane Chegwin, both marked, witness George Chirgwin signed, other witness signed all the marriage on that page so possibly the parish clerk.

marriage entry on FamilySearch
http://www.rootschat.com/links/01nwc/
Cornwall: Allen, Bevan, Bosisto, Carnpezzack, Donithorn, Huddy, James, Retallack, Russell, Vincent, Yeoman
Cards: Thomas (Llanbadarn Fawr)
Glam: Bowler, Cram, Galloway, James, Thomas, Watkins
Lincs: Coupland, Cram
Mon: Cram, Gwyn, John, Philpot, Smart, Watkins
Pembs: Edwards (St. Dogmael's)
Yorks: Airey, Bowler, Elliott, Hare, Hewitt, Kellett, Kemp, Stephenson, Tebb

Offline tancor1

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 54
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: nancarrow
« Reply #8 on: Saturday 08 June 19 09:39 BST (UK) »
thanks  to everyone,if Jane was with them in Brotton in 1871 maybe i should broaden my search for her death,i thought that she had died in Cornwall but it is looking like this is not the case
Pages: [1] 2