Sky
Did you read the information in one of the above posts i sent, in one of the accounts from this book below its states about the Dyke Drain, and Fields next to Bosworth Road ....."Two fields near the Colliery survive"
Robert Mellors, Old Nottingham suburbs: then and now Wilford 1914
NORTH WILFORD
Between the King's Meadow and Wilford Meadow, it is probable, the boundary was a great dyke. A lithographic view of Nottingham was taken by Henry Burn in 1845, apparently from the northern boundary dyke of Wilford parish, at the junction of King's Meadow and Wilford Roads. It shows the footpath to the ferry, and the dyke
Crocuses. At the middle of the last century millions of crocuses were growing on both parts of North Wilford meadows, forming a sight of beauty such as no-one who had seen them could ever forget. They are nearly all gone now. Two fields near the Colliery survive, west of Bosworth road Schools. But why mourn over lost flowers?
The places where they grew are occupied with houses, and the houses are full of children, and the children are more beautiful, and of greater value than the flowers.
Sky click on this link below that i sent you before, it lets you zoom right in, at the bottom is the area we talk of, and see Bosworth Road to, look at the Dyke, there is massive amounts of evidence in all the storys to start forming a bigger picture, do not just collect pieces of paper, thats just like a game, you want to learn of the Wilshers and their life as i do, its not that easy though, you can just collect census records, i notice you refear to such things in a way that they are hard evidence, theres far more to People than most people are innterested in, you can only be yourself i guess, i am just being me
https://maps.nls.uk/view/101603268Sky read again all the evidence try and look into the storys, they all contain evidence, it is easy like most people do and just skip through storys and only look for a name or a date, this way of researching is just like playing a jigzaw puzzle or card game, most people just are not rearly innterested in the truth, its the taking part in a bit of a fun time that they like, you wanted to find out about Smiths Field, if at the end you may write a book or a great report up of the Wilshers, you have done a very good job of it so far, well done
Friday 19 July 1895
ACTION FOR DAMAGE GRASS. Smith v. Forman.—ln this action Mr. Georg Smith, farmer, of Wilford, sought to recover from Mr. Arthur Forman of Wilford, the sum o £69 11s., damage done to mowing grass trespass alleged to have been committed by Mr. Forman cattle and horses in the summer of 1893. that of the plaintiff comprising about 19 and a half acres, which the liad out for mowing in May, 1893. Between the fields there was a dyke, and this dyke formed a natural barrier. In the summer of 1893 it was a particularly dry one, and the dyke was frequently dried up. Some gipsies were allowed to have cattle on a field near by but these animals could not get into his field…… Richard Blount said that he was employed in cleaning the new drain in 1893 until July. He had seen horses and ponies belonging to gipsies grazing on the mowing grass in question, and had noticed the gipsies fetch them off in the morning.... . —Edward Ross, who superintended the men making the new drain, said he had seen horses and donkeys belonging to the gipsies encamped at the other side of the drain in the mowing piece.—Samuel Fox, who assisted in cutting the new drain, gave similar evidence . He had seen the animals which did not belong to Mr. Forman in the mowing piece. The cattle could get in by the footbridge put over the dyke by the Clifton Colliery Company.— Thomas Lamin, foreman to Mr. Arthur Forman, said that in 1893 there was a certain amount bother about cattle going backwards and forwards over ihe dyke.Cattle got onto Mr Foremans land, both from the plaintiffs and other peoples fields. Witness had seen animals belonging to gipsies on Mr Smith land…… . So far as they could tell, however, the matter had been very much exaggerated. The gipsies, either rightly or wrongly, had their horses in, and if damage was done it certainly was not all not done by Mr. Foreman……………. Having reviewed the evidence, his Lordship said he thought, he should do justice if he gave judgment for 50 guineas with costs
"Richard Blount said that he was employed in cleaning the new drain in 1893 until July. He had seen horses and ponies belonging to gipsies grazing on the mowing grass in question, and had noticed the gipsies fetch them off in the morning.... . —Edward Ross, who superintended the men making the new drain, said he had seen horses and donkeys belonging to the gipsies encamped at the other side of the drain in the mowing piece.—Samuel Fox, who assisted in cutting the new drain, gave similar evidence . He had seen the animals which did not belong to Mr. Forman in the mowing piece. The cattle could get in by the footbridge put over the dyke by the Clifton Colliery Company"
and liston to this Cliffton Colliery is on the same side of the river as Hawthorne Street, think about it, that must or may meen George Smith the Farmer had one of the fields and thats why it was known in the older records as Smiths Field, its only a maybe we have to start somewhere