Author Topic: Very Similar Birth Certificates  (Read 1341 times)

Offline Auldfarrt

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 22
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Very Similar Birth Certificates
« Reply #9 on: Tuesday 14 May 19 15:55 BST (UK) »
Thanks again to everyone that has replied. The direction and advice has been great. It's first time I come up against twins, I'll be ready next time. ;)

Offline Andrew Tarr

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,029
  • Wanted: Charles Percy Liversidge
    • View Profile
Re: Very Similar Birth Certificates
« Reply #10 on: Tuesday 14 May 19 17:34 BST (UK) »
Thanks chaps, I hadn't thought of twins. There is a time on both certificates, but it's difficult to make out. One of them looks like "10h, a, m" whilst the other looks like "10h, 15m by m". I think maybe twins is the answer, and that the one that has "15m" noted on it is possibly 15 minutes after the first - if that's possible.
 
More than possible in my opinion.  The reason is to allow for inheritance disputes if primogeniture is invoked - not likely in the lives of ordinary people.  Some registrars entered times for many, even most, births, so it doesn't always indicate a twin.
Tarr, Tydeman, Liversidge, Bartlett, Young