Author Topic: new beta on ancestry dna results  (Read 30423 times)

Offline rsel

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 447
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: new beta on ancestry dna results
« Reply #171 on: Thursday 16 May 19 12:38 BST (UK) »
Yes, unlinking and relinking has already been done, may try it again some time!
.

Just to be clear I am not talking about my DNA results from me, but I actually unlinked myself from my parents in the tree.
Sellens - Sussex
Newham - Surrey
Wellington - Dagenham, Essex
Camp - South Essex
Wren - Essex
Livermore - Essex
Wane - Essex
Fisk - Essex / Suffolk
Bailey/Bayley - Sussex
Newton - Sussex
Funnell - Sussex
Streeter - Sussex
Coates - Sussex
Maisey - Surrey

Offline Flemming

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 913
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: new beta on ancestry dna results
« Reply #172 on: Saturday 18 May 19 11:16 BST (UK) »
Two more bugs on Ancestry Beta. Does anyone else get these problems?

With matches set to 'distant', and the filter set to 'matches you haven't viewed', click on the name at the top of the list and ... the name doesn't open. Instead, you're returned to the list of all matches (distant and otherwise) and without a filter (i.e. regardless of whether you've viewed them or not). Set it all up again ('distant', 'not viewed yet') and the name at the top of the list has disappeared because you've clicked on it once before, even if it hasn't actually opened for you.

This is a grade 1 pain when you're looking through <20cM matches because you have to scroll through all 'distant matches' (without the 'not viewed' filter) to try and find the name again (finishing War and Peace whilst you do this). This also requires you to remember the name.

You might think an easier option is to (a) make a note of the name before daring to click on it, then (b) look them up in the Member Directory if you get thrown out of the filter. This is fine as long as the name isn't John Smith. Fortunately, it's been happening on some obscure names, but here we have bug no. 2. For several days, if I click on a member in the directory, it says:

Quote
We're sorry, information on this page is temporarily unavailable. You can try reloading the page in your browser, or come back later.

How much later is 'later'?

As ever, I'd stumbled across a name that has info I need but will have to scroll from 20cM down to 14cM to find it again. Unless I 'come back later.' Losing the will  ::)



Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,901
    • View Profile
Re: new beta on ancestry dna results
« Reply #173 on: Saturday 18 May 19 12:10 BST (UK) »
Quote
With matches set to 'distant', and the filter set to 'matches you haven't viewed', click on the name at the top of the list and ... the name doesn't open.

It open for me.

Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=877762.0

Offline Flemming

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 913
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: new beta on ancestry dna results
« Reply #174 on: Saturday 18 May 19 12:36 BST (UK) »
They open for me as well for a while - it happens every so often - eleven names lost so far this morning.


Offline Mart 'n' Al

  • RootsChat Leaver
  • RootsChat Pioneer
  • *
  • Posts: 0
    • View Profile
Re: new beta on ancestry dna results
« Reply #175 on: Tuesday 21 May 19 11:04 BST (UK) »
I mentioned ThruLines in an email.  The spellchecker wanted to change it to 'unruliness'.  Does it know something?

Martin

Offline Flemming

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 913
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: new beta on ancestry dna results
« Reply #176 on: Tuesday 21 May 19 11:18 BST (UK) »
It knows something we all know  ;) Hopeless. Still getting the statement in post 172 (above) on member profiles. Done all the usual clearing of cookies, etc., etc., etc. It resolved for 10 seconds yesterday and then came back (both before the cookie clearing). How can I tell if we share DNA or not?  ::)

Offline Mart 'n' Al

  • RootsChat Leaver
  • RootsChat Pioneer
  • *
  • Posts: 0
    • View Profile
Re: new beta on ancestry dna results
« Reply #177 on: Tuesday 21 May 19 11:51 BST (UK) »
My cousin in Australia just tried it and managed to get the second piece of confirming evidence that we've had in a week, for something we have long suspected.  I can't try it as I was tested by MyHeritage.

Martin

Offline sugarfizzle

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,517
    • View Profile
Re: new beta on ancestry dna results
« Reply #178 on: Tuesday 21 May 19 14:04 BST (UK) »
Martin, I woulde seriously suggest that the next time there is an offer on, get an Ancestry DNA test done.

There are drawbacks, like no chromosome browser, but the database is so much bigger than myheritageDNA,  and a lot of matches have trees.

Regards Margaret
STEER, mainly Surrey, Kent; PINNOCKS/HAINES, Gosport, Hants; BARKER, mainly Broadwater, Sussex; Gosport, Hampshire; LAVERSUCH, Micheldever, Hampshire; WESTALL, London, Reading, Berks; HYDE, Croydon, Surrey; BRIGDEN, Hadlow, Kent and London; TUTHILL/STEPHENS, London
WILKINSON, Leeds, Yorkshire and Liverpool; WILLIAMSON, Liverpool; BEARE, Yeovil, Somerset; ALLEN, Kent and London; GORST, Liverpool; HOYLE, mainly Leeds, Yorkshire

Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.go

Offline Mart 'n' Al

  • RootsChat Leaver
  • RootsChat Pioneer
  • *
  • Posts: 0
    • View Profile
Re: new beta on ancestry dna results
« Reply #179 on: Tuesday 21 May 19 14:11 BST (UK) »
Margaret, sadly I can't justify the cost, but fortunately my half first cousin has been tested by Ancestry.  Mine was with MyHeritage, also now on GEDmatch.

Martin