JenB - re your post 70.
The Victorian Marriage Certificate has a separate column headed Birthplace....in that box corresponding to Joseph's entry, it states "N Shields, Northumberland' as his POB - it appears the same hand as the Presbyterian Minister Rvd. Cutcham (

) who married them. One would assume the Minister asked him where he was born.........along with his current marital status haha
Being Presbyterian would also to my mind, lessen the chances of him being Irish...but then his new wife was Irish - who knows?
I did entertain the possibility some time back he may have been illegitimate (did the Bastardry Bonds continue in the 1830's and in that county)?....an online search I did some years ago did not show any accurate listing from what I could access anyway....wasn't much....you would think if he was, then there would be a documentary trail leading to him there, previous bonds I have traced have all been well documented, granted somewhat earlier and in different counties, ......but never the less, there is always a documentary trail to follow but not here!
So the other possibility being born outside the parish could account for any lack of information on his parents also, he claimed to be a Northumbrian (is that correct

?) despite documentary proof (Marriage certs) showing his 'heritage' - but with all the prevarications we've found so far tends to make me agree with you - there's little that is not incontrovertible with Joseph......sorry about all the double negatives...

..
The documents I sought for him in Victoria did not offer any information at all, just more questions....this chap died intestate and no parents were known. Equally no Inquest was held on his death.......I'm still not 100% sure I have the correct chaps' death due to lack of any corroborative documentation here (ie the 1887 death) - continuing to look at that as well....
Yes, JenB - I do tend to agree that we are looking at the same child Mary and am also confused given the bigamous marriages why the child was referred to Joseph the father, would suggest they still had contact or there were perhaps grand parents aware of the situation....most likely they thought Joseph was deceased by then which would be an 'out' for charges of bigamy at least........who knows...am just thinking out loud......?
.......it's as if he did not want to be found....perhaps his parents are also porkies then....??