Author Topic: Completed thanks  (Read 3279 times)

Offline flocklet

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 295
  • More cheese, Gromit!
    • View Profile
Re: Partnership 1844.
« Reply #18 on: Saturday 25 March 06 10:33 GMT (UK) »
Mike,
Thank you so much for your invaluable help. I do appreciated the time you've taken to look up those directories. Wade is an unusual name is'nt it. I'll give George a go on the will.
I meant to say on previous post, that I find half the battle for clues is knowing what terminology to put in the searches, I always seem to go for the simple search. I suppose time & practice, I'll find more. :-\I'll let you know how I go with this one.
Thanks again,
Stella
HOLTON - Middlesex
MASKELL - London & Essex
WENLOCK - All
CHANDLER - Surrey
ECCLESTON - Lancashire & London
MOORE - Kent
GOREHAM - All
HUDSON - Surrey
FARRAND

Offline flocklet

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 295
  • More cheese, Gromit!
    • View Profile
Re: Partnership 1844.
« Reply #19 on: Tuesday 28 March 06 22:10 BST (UK) »
Hi Mike,
Have downloaded the will of George Holton, it does not look promising. It's quite a long will, (going cross-eyed trying to read it!), he states his four children, a Elizabeth Ann, Sarah, John Payce, & Maria. I looked at the IGI, these children are born between 1785 & 1794. No mention of Wenlock in there anywhere, so I'm not sure he is related? I tried a George with father of Richard on the IGI, closest I came was 1725 in Berkshire. No good, as Richard was born approx. 1750. So it looks like back to the drawing board.
But, thank you Mike for your taking the time to look around for these elusive people!
Thanks again,  :)
Stella
HOLTON - Middlesex
MASKELL - London & Essex
WENLOCK - All
CHANDLER - Surrey
ECCLESTON - Lancashire & London
MOORE - Kent
GOREHAM - All
HUDSON - Surrey
FARRAND