Just for the record John 'Symson' ag lab aged 49 was in Fifield on the 1851 census with his wife Sarah aged 46 - no children. They were the only Simpsons in the village. However in Hampton in Arden Warwickshire there was William Simpson an ag lab born circa 1785 Fifield and his daughter Elizabeth born circa 1826 in Hampton. There was also Amy Simpson born circa 1783 Fifield and unmarried staying with her blind pauper sister Ann Heritage born Fifield circa 1781. They were in Chilson and Pudlicott Oxfordshire.
Regards
Valda
Just to confirm that Ann Simpson's parents were
William Simpson and Susannah
Ann was baptised 1773
Her siblings were
Emy (sic) bapt 1777
Richard bapt 1779
Elizabeth bapt 1784
James bapt 1785
William bapt 1786
So the William you found on the census is probably Ann's brother.
I don't have any John Simpson's at the moment, but he could be the son of James, Richard or William as above. I will check the Fifield fiche again later.
I don't have an Amy Simpson at all and she would have been born between Richard and Elizabeth if she was a sibling. I don't think she
is a sibling because her sister Ann now Mrs Heritage is 8 years younger than Avica's mother. But one must assume they are at least cousins to some degree. Fifield was a tiny little place as I have said before, judging by the paucity of baptisms. I will have a look for her on the fiche too, just for interest.
Incidentally I am having second thoughts about Hannah/Ann Simpson who married William Masters in Harbury.
I have noticed, or redrawn my own attention to the fact that when William and Hannah had their daughter Mary Ann baptised, the vicar called Hannah "Ann."
So perhaps it is not Fifield that cannot tell the difference between Hannah and Ann, but the vicar of Harbury.
I cannot really get over the coincidence of the only William Wilson or William Masters in the village of Harbury in 1841 aged 15, staying with a woman whose maiden name is Simpson and who comes from Fifield, while his mother is also a Simpson from Fifield. Then there is the coincidence of baptism dates for Mary Ann and William.
How much more proof do we think we want?
To recap
Ann Simpson was baptised in 1773
Hannah Masters was born approx 1791 in 1841, aged 50, Ann would have been 68
approx 1786 in 1851, aged 66, Ann would have been 78
approx 1782 in 1861, aged 79, Ann would have been 88.
Now you cannot be baptised before you are born, so she had to have been born no later than 1773.
Avica was born in 1800 making Ann 27 that year.
Mary Ann was born in 1814 making Ann 41 that year - which might be why they only had one child?
If Ann and Hannah are the same woman, was she trying to hide the gap between her and her husband? A long liver if she lived to 88 plus, but then Avica lived to 93.
If they are not the same woman then I would suggest that Hannah could be the sister of Amy and Ann who Valda found on the 1851 census elsewhere in Oxfordshire and none of them were baptised, or at least not in Fifield.
That being the case Ann and Hannah could be cousins and it is still quite possible that Avica entrusted baby William to his male relative and her mother's cousin.
Thoughts?
JAP - ask your friend if s/he is related to any Heritage family from Oxfordshire! I see there are 57 entries with my own family name in NSW. Very interesting.
Best wishes
Louise