William STANBURY born 4 Oct 1796 Hatherleigh, Devon.

[Flemming]

If it helps, our line is Stanbury x Bevan and has DNA matches to Stanbury x Metters, as well as Stanbury x Angel.

Ann Metters possible bp 1785 Launceston to William x Ann (possibly nee Culliss, married 1785 Launceston).

[arishmell]

If it helps, our line is Stanbury x Bevan and has DNA matches to Stanbury x Metters, as well as Stanbury x Angel.

Ann Metters possible bp 1785 Launceston to William x Ann (possibly nee Culliss, married 1785 Launceston).

My line is Stanbury/Fewings/Angel as well.  No Metters or Bevan.

[goldfinch99]

Would anyone be able to help with my Stanbury ancestors?

We have William Stanbury born c1785 unknown location.  Moves to Portsea and has children there.  Son William is born around 1816, unknown mother.

Elder William married Ann Weable in Portsea (or Eling) and they have more children.

All the children's names I have so far are, William 1816ish, Susanna 1818, John 1821, Ann 1824, George 1826, Mary 1826.
e went to America.

Are you saying William Stanbury (elder) and Ann Weable are the parents of William, Susanna, John, Ann, George and Mary. You haven't provided marriage details but the only marriage/marriage licence details I could find had them marrying 1824.

Sorry, I meant that Ann Weable must be the mother for the children after the marriage but that I wasn't sure if she was the mother of the earlier ones or not.  I've a situation in another part of my tree where a couple had children for about 10 years while the previous wife was still alive, so I didn't know if something similar had happened here!

Daughter Ann Stanbury is baptised March 1824, same month as the marriage to Ann Weable.  So I guess the first three children are from the first wife, and second three from Ann Weable?

[goldfinch99]

If it helps, our line is Stanbury x Bevan and has DNA matches to Stanbury x Metters, as well as Stanbury x Angel.

Ann Metters possible bp 1785 Launceston to William x Ann (possibly nee Culliss, married 1785 Launceston).

My line is Stanbury/Fewings/Angel as well.  No Metters or Bevan.

I didn't find Bevan when I searched matches on my account.  It's only now I've got my aunt's results that it's shown up.

[arishmell]

William senior 1785 Lifton to John Stanbury x Susanna Bevan. Married Ann Metters 1814 Plymouth.

The Fewings/Angel connection is uncertain. It could be through Peter Stanbury 1754 Inwardleigh to Samuel Stanbury x Mary Newcombe, but there is a Peter still in Inwardleigh in 1817 (his death) married to Martha Yeo (his Will names her).

My Great x5 grandfather Peter Stanbury, origins unknown, died Plymouth 1832, married Anne Angel 20 Sep 1781 in Hatherleigh.  Their daughter Anne married John Fewings 26 Sep 1813 in Hatherleigh.  I have a note by Peter's record saying he is absolutely NOT the Inwardleigh Peter!

[goldfinch99]

I've found another DNA match that contains a Peter Stanbury line

Peter Stanbury/Ann Angell
Their son James Stanbury to Mary Gartrell
James's son James to Ellen Jenn

I'm just putting the partial bit in so that it's not revealing anything too private for anyone.

[hanes teulu]

Would anyone be able to help with my Stanbury ancestors?

We have William Stanbury born c1785 unknown location.  Moves to Portsea and has children there.  Son William is born around 1816, unknown mother.

Elder William married Ann Weable in Portsea (or Eling) and they have more children.

All the children's names I have so far are, William 1816ish, Susanna 1818, John 1821, Ann 1824, George 1826, Mary 1826.
e went to America.

Are you saying William Stanbury (elder) and Ann Weable are the parents of William, Susanna, John, Ann, George and Mary. You haven't provided marriage details but the only marriage/marriage licence details I could find had them marrying 1824.

Sorry, I meant that Ann Weable must be the mother for the children after the marriage but that I wasn't sure if she was the mother of the earlier ones or not.  I've a situation in another part of my tree where a couple had children for about 10 years while the previous wife was still alive, so I didn't know if something similar had happened here!

Daughter Ann Stanbury is baptised March 1824, same month as the marriage to Ann Weable.  So I guess the first three children are from the first wife, and second three from Ann Weable?

There's a William Stanbury, bap 27 Jul 1815, abode Cresswell Court, parents William & Ann, father labourer. You consider/assume him to be the son of William (elder) who later married Ann Weable. Was this confirmed from the marriage cert of Stanbury/Ingram, Holborn 1840?.

Which leaves "William born to William (elder), around 1816,mother unknown" - or am I not reading it correctly. What's the provenance of this William? 

[goldfinch99]

Would anyone be able to help with my Stanbury ancestors?

We have William Stanbury born c1785 unknown location.  Moves to Portsea and has children there.  Son William is born around 1816, unknown mother.

Elder William married Ann Weable in Portsea (or Eling) and they have more children.

All the children's names I have so far are, William 1816ish, Susanna 1818, John 1821, Ann 1824, George 1826, Mary 1826.
e went to America.

Are you saying William Stanbury (elder) and Ann Weable are the parents of William, Susanna, John, Ann, George and Mary. You haven't provided marriage details but the only marriage/marriage licence details I could find had them marrying 1824.

Sorry, I meant that Ann Weable must be the mother for the children after the marriage but that I wasn't sure if she was the mother of the earlier ones or not.  I've a situation in another part of my tree where a couple had children for about 10 years while the previous wife was still alive, so I didn't know if something similar had happened here!

Daughter Ann Stanbury is baptised March 1824, same month as the marriage to Ann Weable.  So I guess the first three children are from the first wife, and second three from Ann Weable?

There's a William Stanbury, bap 27 Jul 1815, abode Cresswell Court, parents William & Ann, father labourer. You consider/assume him to be the son of William (elder) who later married Ann Weable. Was this confirmed from the marriage cert of Stanbury/Ingram, Holborn 1840?.

Which leaves "William born to William (elder), around 1816,mother unknown" - or am I not reading it correctly. What's the provenance of this William?

Yes, I am pretty sure that 1816 birth is our William b 1816 to William and Ann.

Flemming has now suggested a possible mother for William 1816 who would be the first wife, also Ann, and that's why William the elder was a widower when he married Ann Weable.

There's a 1841 census with William the elder living with youngest daughter Mary in Portsea and he's a victualler.

That matches with the marriage certs of his sons William and John (William the younger signed John's marriage cert.  On this one it says Wiliam sr is deceased, and I believe there is a record of him dying in 1846. So everything on our side fits together nicely.

I'd love to know what happened to the other siblings of William 1816.

[goldfinch99]

I've got another DNA match here to Thomas Stanbury b 1870 Stoke Damerel. He moved to America where there's an extant lineage that I've matched to.

According to these trees, which I haven't had time to verify everything yet, that Thomas was son of

Thomas Stanbury 1847 or 1848, born Jersey, Channel Islands to Abraham Stanbury born 1817. I trust that all of that will add up nicely, I did have a quick look at the census and it looks fine.

There is a tree here with ancestry for Abraham 1817 but I haven't gone through it to verify everything.

They have Abraham Stanbury 1817, Launceston, Cornwall.
His father John Stanbury 1783, born Lifton, dies Launceston
John's parents are John Stanbury and Susannah Bevan.

So this backs up John Stanbury/Susanna Bevan being the parents of William c 1785.

So why is my aunt, and this distant cousin who descends from William and Isabella, matching to the  Fewing line?  Wouldn't this suggest a connection like 1st or 2nd cousins between Ann 1794 who married Fewing and my William c1785?