Still looking out for Alice Mary Ann Marshall, bearing in mind from baptismal records we know here ate of birth
On Ancestry family trees there is a very interesting entry, using baptism records for this child but completely different research to what we have been searching for, hopefully one the postees would like to have a look including watsonbrown, what do you all think?
Louisa Maud
Just thought it was worth listing why that baptism cannot belong to the De Zouche Marshall family.
1. John James de Zouche Marshall is a Surgeon
NOT James a labourer2. Other children apparently baptised Lamberhurst. Why would you suddenly have one baptised in London.
3. Marriages of other children take place during decade pre ww1. 1901, 1904 & 1910. Father is a witness at all. And signs as John J De Z. Marshall. Ie known as John.
4. From 3, If Alice Was a de Zouche Marshall one would expect her to either be very obvious or dead.
I am sure there are other reasons, but that seems enough