« Reply #410 on: Wednesday 05 June 19 00:02 BST (UK) »
Family tree on another site - not Anc. A woman buried the day before she died.
A quick look at parish register showed 2 women with same name buried in the parish a few days apart - 1st a spinster, 2nd, (correct one) a widow. Same tree - woman's grandson buried a month after death.
Again the parish register revealed burials of 2 individuals with same name within a few weeks, 1st was a child or minor, so the person in question was obviously the 2nd burial.
Those examples are a too common fault unfortunately. Too many inexperienced (lazy?) researchers look at an online record without looking at the original image.
Personally I find great enjoyment in looking at the old records, not only to see my ancestors' names but to see their friends, neighbours and community as well.
How much extra information these researchers miss by not looking at the originals.
I am Australian, from all the lands I come (my ancestors, at least!)
Pine/Pyne, Dowdeswell, Kempster, Sando/Sandoe/Sandow, Nancarrow, Hounslow, Youatt, Richardson, Jarmyn, Oxlade, Coad, Kelsey, Crampton, Lindner, Pittaway, and too many others to name.
Devon, Dorset, Gloucs, Cornwall, Warwickshire, Bucks, Oxfordshire, Wilts, Germany, Sweden, and of course London, to name a few.