Marriage Wilkinson-King

[fataussie]

Hi Trish1120
Thank you I have found most of what you have also.
I think the only real evidence to prove it would be that we have a Mary King aged 20 and a daughter Charlotte living with Jonathan & Charlotte in 1841.

I just noticed that you posted while I was typing the exact baptism for William Frederick.
So it looks like a bit more chasing to do.

[trish1120]

Even though it didnt say she was widowed I think you are on the right track.

Have you found a Marriage for Mary King born 1818? I have tried to track her and Charlotte in 1851 with nothing conclusive.

If she married hopefully she would name her Father as John King.

[fataussie]

Hi Trish1120
I believe this may be them in 1851, it is show as Baleman but later records show Bateman
Name:    Mary Ann Baleman
Age:    32
Estimated Birth Year:    abt 1819
Relation:    Wife
Spouse's Name:    Robt Baleman
Gender:    Female
Where born:    Durham, England
Civil Parish:    Tanfield
Registration district:    Durham(Street Indexed)
Sub-registration district:    Tanfield
ED, institution, or vessel:    1b
Neighbors:    
Household schedule number:    91
Piece:    2389
Folio:    37
Page Number:    28
Household Members:    
Name    Age
Robt Baleman    36
Mary Ann Baleman    32
Charlotte Baleman    10

This is possibly the Marriage which throws up another question

Name:    Robert Bateman
Registration Year:    1848
Registration Quarter:    Jul-Aug-Sep
Registration district:    Houghton le Spring
Inferred County:    Durham
Volume:    24
Page:    164
Mary Ann Eddy ??

I look on Familysearch and the Bishop Transcripts only go to 1847.
I think I need to sit down & sort it out over the weekend. Possibly need to buy Mary Ann's Marriage certificate to see her father.

[River Tyne Lass]

If you don't mind a wait of up to a few weeks I will look up in the Houghton-le-Spring register for Mary's marriage.
This will be at Tyne and Wear Archives as you can see if you look up on 'User Guides' on the link below.

http://www.margaret-hall-genealogy.com/page7.htm

[trish1120]

Yes I thought that was the possible 1851 Census for Mary/Charlotte but didnt match up the Marriage.

[River Tyne Lass]

Microfilm 908 - Tyne and Wear Archives

St Nicholas, Hetton-le-Hole
Entry 389, Page 195
Writing is debateable on register for Robert's surname but could either be Baleman or Bateman & Mary Ann Eddy
His age 32
Her age 31
Bachelor & Spinster
Robert was a 'Pitman'
Residence for both: Easington Lane
Fathers:
John Baleman or Bateman - Pitman
Charlotte Eddy - Single Woman
Both Robert and Mary Ann signed with their marks
Witnesses - James Young + (J M Paterson?)

This is the first time I have ever come across a female name in the Father's column.

If you also wish to have a photocopy of this record the staff at Tyne and Wear Archives have said they would only charge £7 instead of their usual £30 as if you present all the information presented above this would be classed as straightforward search.

I hope this is helpful for your research.

[fataussie]

Thank you very much for the information River Tyne Lass.
Sorry to take so long to reply but I have been away looking for warmer weather.

Cheers from Oz.

[barryd]

Durham Records Online does have the Wilkinson/King marriage. It would be a transcript but normally they are very good at transcribing. I check all my Durham families through them.

[JayG]

Microfilm 908 - Tyne and Wear Archives

St Nicholas, Hetton-le-Hole
Entry 389, Page 195
Writing is debateable on register for Robert's surname but could either be Baleman or Bateman & Mary Ann Eddy
His age 32
Her age 31
Bachelor & Spinster
Robert was a 'Pitman'
Residence for both: Easington Lane
Fathers:
John Baleman or Bateman - Pitman
Charlotte Eddy - Single Woman
Both Robert and Mary Ann signed with their marks
Witnesses - James Young + (J M Paterson?)

This is the first time I have ever come across a female name in the Father's column.

If you also wish to have a photocopy of this record the staff at Tyne and Wear Archives have said they would only charge £7 instead of their usual £30 as if you present all the information presented above this would be classed as straightforward search.

I hope this is helpful for your research.

Durham Record Office's fee for the same thing would be £5.00 sent by second class post or email.

Jay