Coombs, yes, that is the man who may or not be the same one as in Hartlepool. We can't tie him to the Hartlepool one to the satisfaction of part of the family. It's odd, I've diligently logged every document and life event that we could find, and I feel it is inconclusive. I am trying to apply the "Genealogical Proof Standard" in an unbiased way, and Electoral Rolls have been incomplete. But...
After writing it as a narrative in my 14:36 post, I am starting to think that Scarborough appears too often for it to be two different men. I look forward to hearing the views of others. Not just views, but also opinions on:
1. Did he desert Mary nee Boynton, or did he live a double life? Why did she continue to describe herself as married? Did she think he was lost at sea? (No evidence found.)
2. Why is he listed as deceased in 1915, when he didn't die for another six years?
3. How/why did he avoid the 1871, 91 and 01 censuses?
Martin