Author Topic: My Scanlan great-grandparents and grandfather  (Read 778 times)

Offline tscanla

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 450
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
My Scanlan great-grandparents and grandfather
« on: Saturday 28 April 18 21:03 BST (UK) »
I would appreciate any attempt to enhance this old photo taken I estimate around 1905 in Minnesota.

Online loord74

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,569
    • View Profile
Re: My Scanlan great-grandparents and grandfather
« Reply #1 on: Sunday 29 April 18 12:52 BST (UK) »
cannot go futher due to lack of details..it would be better if your Re-scan it with 300 DPI for better retoration

Offline japeflakes

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,516
    • View Profile
Re: My Scanlan great-grandparents and grandfather
« Reply #2 on: Monday 30 April 18 17:27 BST (UK) »
Just to see what happens with no marks removed: However it looks poor so removed, sorry

I think this is already scanned at 600dpi but I could be wrong

Offline tscanla

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 450
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: My Scanlan great-grandparents and grandfather
« Reply #3 on: Monday 30 April 18 17:55 BST (UK) »
Thanks. That does look a little better. Unfortunately I do not have the original available to re-scan.


Offline Mike Morrell (NL)

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 502
  • Netherlands
    • View Profile
Re: My Scanlan great-grandparents and grandfather
« Reply #4 on: Tuesday 01 May 18 01:54 BST (UK) »
The scan resolution is indeed 600 dpi. In 2015, there was originally a high quality version of this file on Picasa (in TIFF format - uncompressed - and 2.3 MB). Much of the original resolution was lost when the TIFF file was saved as a smaller JPG (compressed) file. This might have been to e-mail the photo, publish it on a website or post it here on Rootschat. The original high resolution has now effectively been reduced to just 120-150 dpi through the JPG compression to reduce the file size.

If you still have access to the original 2.3 MB TIFF file, you'll get the best results by saving it somewhere online (like Dropbox, Google Photos) and posting a link to it here rather than posting the smaller JPG file.

Mike

Thanks. That does look a little better. Unfortunately I do not have the original available to re-scan.
Photo restorers may re-use and improve on my posted versions. Acknowledgement appreciated.

Offline Trishanne

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,247
    • View Profile
Re: My Scanlan great-grandparents and grandfather
« Reply #5 on: Tuesday 01 May 18 15:20 BST (UK) »
A try from me
Pat
Bownass - Lancashire & Westmorland
Hoggarth - Lancashire & Westmorland
Jackson- Lancaster
Waller - Dent, Yorkshire dales
Omerod - Lancashire
Redburn - Lancashire
Evans - Hereford

RESTORERS please do not use my restores without my permission THANK YOU

Offline tscanla

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 450
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: My Scanlan great-grandparents and grandfather
« Reply #6 on: Tuesday 01 May 18 16:35 BST (UK) »
Thank you, Pat.