« Reply #1 on: Thursday 26 April 18 02:21 BST (UK) »
Looking at my figures as an example
English 69.8% Irish, Scottish, and Welsh 13.9%
East European 8.4% Iberian 7.9%
These , as an Australian , seem to be accurate to the degree of English etc. The other European based on other analysis are more likely to follow the migration trail of 1000-2000 years ago.
I think the only thing to take from that 17% is you match the analysis of Scandinavian descent. That could be from the time of Harold or earlier.
Another option is to look at the history of your family. ie are they Northern England or Kentish etc that had a higher number of Norse settlers. As an example my Iberian could come from the settling of Ireland by the Spanish or it could be a stepping stone from the African continent.
Ethnicity percentages should only be used as a guide and never a definitive explanation of current ethinicity.
Genealogy-Its a family thing
Paternal: Gibbins,McNamara, Jenkins, Schumann, Inwood, Sheehan, Quinlan, Tierney, Cole
Maternal: Munn, Simpson , Brighton, Clayfield, Westmacott, Corbell, Hatherell, Blacksell/Blackstone, Boothey , Muirhead
Son: Bull, Kneebone, Lehmann, Cronin, Fowler, Yates, Biglands, Rix, Carpenter, Pethick, Carrick, Male, London, Jacka, Tilbrook, Scott, Hampshire, Buckley
Brickwalls- Schumann, Simpson,Westmacott/Wennicot
Scott, Cronin
Gedmatch Kit : T812072