Tate of Wistow; Rimington of Pontefract; Todd, Turner & Wharrey of Selby

[BushInn1746]

Hello Dave and All

I have always understood that when the house in Millgate, Selby, occupied by John Hood at Selby was transferred in 1790, that William Rimington of Pontefract (one of the parties) mentioned in the Transfer document, was linked to the Rimmington of Gateforth Family, because they also owned property at Pontefract according to the Yorks Arch. Soc. Handlist ...

YAS MD 212 Handlist of Documents, Rimmington of Gateforth Collection

YAS DD212.pdf
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://explore.library.leeds.ac.uk/multimedia/19357/YAS_DD212.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwj-2YS3k8n4AhVkQEEAHWXSBcIQFnoECBYQAQ&usg=AOvVaw1Dgua28sZvcymUDnQ9P_sT

The other things are :-

John Hood appears in the earliest Selby Land Tax we have of 1781.

1) Also currently we have no Marriage for John Hood of Selby, Mariner, marriage, to Jane (buried Selby 1803).

2) No known Yorkshire baptism for George Hood of Selby c.1785 (from his age of 60 years at his death at Selby in 1845).

2nd Add:
We also know John Hood of Selby, Mariner, was born Scarborough (Muster Rolls) and when Maudland Turner (nee Hood) had her first child at Selby in 1795 her descent was stated and also she was born Scarborough.

Scarborough Banns in 1781 John Hood to marry Martha Dean, but no record of the Marriage was found, either.

Added:
I'm thinking, John Hood, Mariner of Selby, had turned to Nonconformism and John Turner, Grocer, his Landlord, might be the same John Turner who was listed in the 1781 Selby Land Tax as Proprietor of the Presbyterian Chapel (earliest baptism records 1797).

Mark

[dobfarm]

Hi Mark,

That John Stagg of Selby (brother in law of John Cockin merchant of London) later Ackworth house ( a place of Quakers and some of George Hood's children in laws were Quakers with George and his wife Sarah being buried in a Quaker burial ground in Selby as none practicing Quackers ) south side of Pontefract.

Just thinking outside the box.

[dobfarm]

Assuming it was the Selby John Hood mariner who was in the marriage Banns readings to Martha Dean 1781 Scarborough register but  for reason unknown, the actual marriage did not happen or not recorded, their relationship could have continue resulting a birth of an illegitimate child ?

[BushInn1746]

Dave,

Yes, still be a child conceived whether they married or not - these frisky HOOD-lums 

Mark