I had a look at the 1881 census to try and find John & Margaret
Search FreeBMD for Marriages Brampton 1880 10b / 625, gives:
Marriages Jun 1880
Batey John Brampton 10b 625
BELL John Brampton 10b 625
HESLOP Margaret Brampton 10b 625
Search FreeBMD for Marriages Brampton 1880 Margaret Bell, gives:
Marriages Jun 1880
BELL Margaret Ann Brampton 10b 525
Marriages Dec 1880
BELL Margaret Brampton 10b 638
So I got the image from 1837Online.
Margaret Ann Bell is clearly 10b 625
For those who are having difficulty with Margaret Bell
The page should read:
Marriages Jun 1880
Batey John Brampton 10b 625
BELL John Brampton 10b 625
BELL Margaret Ann Brampton 10b 625
HESLOP Margaret Brampton 10b 625
Just when I thought I had this resolved, I notice the Margaret Bell, married Dec quarter, 1880, and that June quarter is Margaret ANN ........
And now we have a John Batey in the mix.
There is also a Margaret Bell m. Haltwhistle 1880 Q2 10b 421
My head hurts. CP
Had a go at tackling the problem from the other end by trying to track down John & Margaret Batey is the 1881 census and there was nobody of the right age. I did however come up with (RG11/5097 F84 P10):
John Batey, Head, 59, Ag Lab, b. Northumberland
Margaret Batey, Wife, 51, b. Acklington
Ann Batey, Dau, 11
James E Batey, Son, 8
In the 1871 census I came up with John Baty (49, Ag Lab) married to Mary and with (among others) a 1 year old daughter named Ann (Ref: RG10/5137 F126 p3).
Theory: John Batey was widowed sometime after 1871 and then married Margaret Heslop in 1880. Mary Ann Bell, Philip's daughter therefore married John Bell.
What do you think?
Al