Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Cheyne Family from Paisley  (Read 1455 times)

Offline scotmum

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,710
  • A tree full of life, a life full of branches!
    • View Profile
Re: Cheyne Family from Paisley
« Reply #9 on: Saturday 25 March 17 21:17 GMT (UK) »
There was a William Cheyne to Elisabeth Marshall marriage in Peterhead Parish in 1805.

Perhaps your Thomas was one of their youngest children.
"As we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns—the ones we don’t know we don’t know."  - Donald Rumsfeld

"Trees without roots fall over!"
 
""People who never look backward to their ancestors will never look forward to posterity." - Edmund Burke

Don't just wait for the storm to pass, learn to dance in the rain.

Offline raidersrule

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 10
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Cheyne Family from Paisley
« Reply #10 on: Monday 27 March 17 11:50 BST (UK) »
Scotmum, 

   Thank you so much!...where did you find that info? any ideas on how to back from there? sorry for late reply I didn't realize there was a page 2 lol.

Offline raidersrule

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 10
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Cheyne Family from Paisley
« Reply #11 on: Monday 27 March 17 11:54 BST (UK) »
I pull nothing from scotlands people in search with that same info. :(

Offline keyboard86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,056
    • View Profile
Re: Cheyne Family from Paisley
« Reply #12 on: Monday 27 March 17 17:49 BST (UK) »
Hi again, I am out of my comfort zone/area when dealing with Scottish ancestry, to help out I can only provide census returns which hopefully will assist!

Are you/we happy that the returns I have already posted are in fact the correct family, if this is the case then a couple of questions need to be verified eg on the 1861 census Thomas is shown as "Son in Law" but in 1871 he is a Widower with Sarah shown as single and acting as a servant for him, is William with the family in 1871 a brother?
Was Thomas a widower when he married Sarah?
Keyboard86
Pelly/Pelley/Kingsbury/Challis/Nalder/Rochester/Raydenbow

UK Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Pages: 1 [2]