Author Topic: Another conundrum! The name on the back of this photograph??  (Read 8273 times)

Offline scotmum

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,683
  • A tree full of life, a life full of branches!
    • View Profile
Re: Another conundrum! The name on the back of this photograph??
« Reply #9 on: Wednesday 22 March 17 08:31 GMT (UK) »
I hadn't realised that the actual photo on reverse was a 'post mortem' one of a child until I inadvertently viewed it when clicking through to a site on google, so appreciate now why you only posted the back of it.  Perhaps a 'warning' in the thread title will prevent folks, when working on the search, from doing as I did (or at least give them the chance to choose to view it or not).

Regarding the first name, I read it, before seeing others thoughts or any of the web links, as 'Tobie', and wonder if perhaps this was a family 'pet' name for him, with perhaps Tobias as part of his full name, but not necessarily his first name.
"As we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns—the ones we don’t know we don’t know."  - Donald Rumsfeld

"Trees without roots fall over!"
 
""People who never look backward to their ancestors will never look forward to posterity." - Edmund Burke

Don't just wait for the storm to pass, learn to dance in the rain.

Offline Ruskie

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,276
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Another conundrum! The name on the back of this photograph??
« Reply #10 on: Wednesday 22 March 17 08:40 GMT (UK) »
The dates are 1871 to 1875.

I was curious about what was on the front of the photo. Can you please provide a link?

Offline scotmum

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,683
  • A tree full of life, a life full of branches!
    • View Profile
Re: Another conundrum! The name on the back of this photograph??
« Reply #11 on: Wednesday 22 March 17 08:47 GMT (UK) »
The dates are 1871 to 1875.

Yes, but not having come across and/or remembered about the Victorian 'fad' for 'post mortem' photos of children, I had assumed it was a picture of a living child, that had been sent to someone to remember him by and let them know of his death.

Whilst the original post did say
Quote
I won't tell you its subject matter (perhaps you can guess from the 'In loving memory of...
the hint was perhaps not clear enough.
 
"As we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns—the ones we don’t know we don’t know."  - Donald Rumsfeld

"Trees without roots fall over!"
 
""People who never look backward to their ancestors will never look forward to posterity." - Edmund Burke

Don't just wait for the storm to pass, learn to dance in the rain.

Offline Ruskie

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,276
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Another conundrum! The name on the back of this photograph??
« Reply #12 on: Wednesday 22 March 17 08:53 GMT (UK) »
It does say born 1871. Died 1875.  ;)

Are you able to provide a link please? If not, I will do some searching later.


Offline PTRACER

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 20
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Another conundrum! The name on the back of this photograph??
« Reply #13 on: Wednesday 22 March 17 09:01 GMT (UK) »
The link is in post #6 on the previous page.

Offline DavidG02

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,124
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Another conundrum! The name on the back of this photograph??
« Reply #14 on: Wednesday 22 March 17 09:53 GMT (UK) »
Looking at other letters for similarities I see the 'ie' in died is similar to the last 2 letters of the name. I can also see a similarity between the H in March and what could be either a B or an H in the name.

Tobie is as good a guess as any other but I would then thought Toby would have been a preferred spelling.
Genealogy-Its a family thing

Paternal: Gibbins,McNamara, Jenkins, Schumann,  Inwood, Sheehan, Quinlan, Tierney, Cole

Maternal: Munn, Simpson , Brighton, Clayfield, Westmacott, Corbell, Hatherell, Blacksell/Blackstone, Boothey , Muirhead

Son: Bull, Kneebone, Lehmann, Cronin, Fowler, Yates, Biglands, Rix, Carpenter, Pethick, Carrick, Male, London, Jacka, Tilbrook, Scott, Hampshire, Buckley

Brickwalls-   Schumann, Simpson,Westmacott/Wennicot
Scott, Cronin
Gedmatch Kit : T812072

Offline loobylooayr

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,327
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Another conundrum! The name on the back of this photograph??
« Reply #15 on: Wednesday 22 March 17 10:26 GMT (UK) »
My thoughts also were Tobie Milne.
Could be as scotsmum has suggested that Tobie was a pet name.
Strange that we are all having no joy finding a candidate.
Are we sure the child was male?

Looby :)

Offline arthurk

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 5,376
    • View Profile
Re: Another conundrum! The name on the back of this photograph??
« Reply #16 on: Wednesday 22 March 17 11:52 GMT (UK) »
I'm wondering if it's .....'s Mite (as in wee child) - in which case finding a name may be almost impossible.

Offline AlexMcK

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 34
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Another conundrum! The name on the back of this photograph??
« Reply #17 on: Wednesday 22 March 17 12:22 GMT (UK) »
Could it be 'Jobie' as in a pet name of Job? There is a christening registration for 19th February 1871, York / Guisborough for Job Taylor Miles at FamilySearch. It would tie in with what appears to be a birth date of January 26th, 1871 on the card (possibly!)

Jobie is also, though a little unusual, a girl's name

Alex