Author Topic: Currie or Watson in Eaglesham  (Read 4874 times)

Offline MonicaL

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 32,650
  • Girl with firewood, Morar 1910 - MEM Donaldson
    • View Profile
Re: Currie or Watson in Eaglesham
« Reply #9 on: Sunday 20 November 16 20:11 GMT (UK) »
I did see the reference to Elizabeth Fulton for Robert Currie's wife. The thing that threw me was that was the same name of John's first wife.... ::)

Monica
Census information Crown Copyright, www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline isobelw

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,566
  • Gran & Granpa Clotworthy
    • View Profile
Re: Currie or Watson in Eaglesham
« Reply #10 on: Sunday 20 November 16 21:05 GMT (UK) »
Clotworthy, McMahon, Saunderson, Culley (Ireland & Scotland)
Weatherall, Greer (Ireland & Scotland)
Hamilton, Johnston, Dawson, Rennie, Wright (Clackmannanshire)

Offline rosie17

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,518
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Currie or Watson in Eaglesham
« Reply #11 on: Sunday 20 November 16 22:05 GMT (UK) »
I did see the reference to Elizabeth Fulton for Robert Currie's wife. The thing that threw me was that was the same name of John's first wife.... ::)

Monica

Yes Monica very confusing 
Rosie

Offline anne_p

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,136
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Currie or Watson in Eaglesham
« Reply #12 on: Monday 21 November 16 00:16 GMT (UK) »
John,
Do you have access to FindMyPast or any newspaper site?

There are a few articles in various newspapers but there is one interesting article in The Stirling Observer relating to this family.
It is dated 14 Nov 1867

It is about a family reunion of 104 people, representing 9, families, all descended from " A Novel Character" named JOHN Currie of Eaglesham.
The article gives no indication of when this man died, or if the descendents were children, grandchildren etc, but at a guess, it probably relates the man who died in 1854

It was Robert Currie of Eaglesham who presided and was supported by 4  younger brothers.
It suggests that at 1867, the late John Currie had 5 surviving sons
( I presume this is the case, although it's not absolutely clear)

Due to T&Cs, I cannot post the article on here but, I can provide you with it if you contact me by PM with an email address


The 1872 death announcement for Elizabeth Fulton, widow of Robert Currie appears in The Glasgow Herald dated 20 May 1872 and  is found on page 5
Note that Australian and US papers were asked to copy.

https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=GGgVawPscysC&dat=18720520&printsec=frontpage&hl=en

EDIT:
1854 death of John Currie also appears in Glasgow Herald dated 16 Oct.
Also on page 5 and can be found using above link.( alter the year search)

Also, if his eldest son was named Robert as per the 1867 article, it suggests that Robert would be the name of John's own father which fits with DonMs post at 17.12


Offline johnwhite

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 22
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Currie or Watson in Eaglesham
« Reply #13 on: Monday 21 November 16 07:34 GMT (UK) »
hi all

Fantastic posts thanks. I have sent a PM.

Will get back once I've read these.

John

Offline Blanched

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 57
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Currie or Watson in Eaglesham
« Reply #14 on: Monday 21 November 16 10:25 GMT (UK) »
The information I have on John Currie & Elizabeth Fulton's children is:

Katherine 1804-1878 married John Watson 1826
Robert 1806-1870 married Agnes Ross 1832
Jean 1808-
John 1810-1884 married Margaret Spence 1832
William 1812-1893 married 1. Janet Cameron 1836 2. Mary Hynds 1851 (in Shotts)
James 1815-
Hamilton 1818-1870 married Isabella Maxwell 1843, Glasgow
Elizabeth 1820-1875 married Peter McFarlane 1841
Betsy 1823-1896 married Matthew Shields Bannatyne 1846 Glasgow
Matthew 1826-1897 married Helen McKie 1851

The names of the older children seem to indicate that they did follow the Scottish naming pattern & there's certainly enough of them for there to be a major family reunion!

Blanche

Offline johnwhite

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 22
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Currie or Watson in Eaglesham
« Reply #15 on: Monday 21 November 16 10:48 GMT (UK) »
Hi Blanche

Do you have any old photographs of any of them? I have none.

Offline johnwhite

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 22
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Currie or Watson in Eaglesham
« Reply #16 on: Monday 21 November 16 10:49 GMT (UK) »
We are descended from Katherine and John

Offline anne_p

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,136
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Currie or Watson in Eaglesham
« Reply #17 on: Monday 21 November 16 11:15 GMT (UK) »
How odd?

I have just realised that John Currie b 1833, son of Robert Currie with Agnes Ross appears in my OWN tree.

John married in 1856 and his daughter Mary also born in 1856 married into my family in 1881

Over the years, I have had many discussions about this relative who was Mary's husband.
His marriage to Mary Currie and his death both state that his parents were the brother of my gg grandfather and his wife.
He was definitely not a biological child !

 Mary's husband was informally adopted by my relatives.
There is NO birth record.
He appears as an infant ( nurse child) with these parents,entered with his birth name and on all following returns, the same child in still in the household and using their surname.

I have done a vast amount of research on my family and the evidence suggests quite clearly that this child ( husband of Mary Currie) was not afforded the same privileges as the biological children.

This man did not name any of his children for his "father"
He did have a son given the same name as a younger "brother" but this "brother" was also extremely well known