Author Topic: Missing Ancestor's Birth  (Read 8632 times)

Online heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 42,517
    • View Profile
Re: Missing Ancestor's Birth
« Reply #9 on: Friday 11 November 16 08:26 GMT (UK) »
Blakey Hartley married Betty Brown 31st August 1822, St Bartholomew's, Colne.

Lancashire OPC http://www.lan-opc.org.uk
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Online BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,759
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Missing Ancestor's Birth
« Reply #10 on: Friday 11 November 16 08:34 GMT (UK) »
Blakey Hartley married Betty Brown 31st August 1822, St Bartholomew's, Colne.

Lancashire OPC http://www.lan-opc.org.uk

Sorry, I'm being negative again  :'( :'(  If you look at the original image for the 1851 census return for Blakey, Betty and Thomas you will see that Thomas is shown as "Un" rather than "Son" in the transcription.

Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Online heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 42,517
    • View Profile
Re: Missing Ancestor's Birth
« Reply #11 on: Friday 11 November 16 08:38 GMT (UK) »
Blakey Hartley married Betty Brown 31st August 1822, St Bartholomew's, Colne.

Lancashire OPC http://www.lan-opc.org.uk

Sorry, I'm being negative again  :'( :'(  If you look at the original image for the 1851 census return for Blakey, Betty and Thomas you will see that Thomas is shown as "Un" rather than "Son" in the transcription.

You are not being negative - we are trying to solve the same conundrum.
If you look at my reply 6, I have posted this information already.
By quoting the marriage I was attempting to disprove the connection between the Hartleys and Thomas Abbott.
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Online heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 42,517
    • View Profile
Re: Missing Ancestor's Birth
« Reply #12 on: Friday 11 November 16 08:41 GMT (UK) »
To confuse the issues re places even more:

There is a baptism at St Peter's Burnley 9th January 1820
Olive Abbott to John and Alice but the abode is shown as Hunslet Fold, parish of Leeds - which then moves nearer to Wakefield  ???
That Joseph is a cloth-dresser.

We really need to know which Abbott person is your ancestor, Bram. None of these may be relevant until that is known.

Heywood
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Online BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,759
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Missing Ancestor's Birth
« Reply #13 on: Friday 11 November 16 10:05 GMT (UK) »
Burials at All Saints, Wakefield:

Joseph - son of George - 13 October 1787 (already noted)
George - son of George - 8 November 1785
Hannah - wife of George - 24 September 1784

Marriage at All Saints, Dewsbury:

George Abbott of the parish of Wakefield, Staymaker and bachelor and Hannah Wilby (x) spinster otp by Banns - 3 February 1779.

Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline Bram Taylor

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 284
    • View Profile
Re: Missing Ancestor's Birth
« Reply #14 on: Friday 11 November 16 10:45 GMT (UK) »
Is there any way I can attach a short family tree to my message? Two pages made in Ancestry. It would make things much more easy to see. It is the direct path from my uncle to joseph and it is complicated because I have two paths to Joseph as my cousin and uncle are Abbotts of course but also, my maternal grandfather married an Abbott relative before he married my maternal grandmother, I told you it was complicated!!
Bram,
Taylor, Baker, Milns, Bayley, Bailey, Evers, Shropshire.
Sewell, Prestidge, Northamptonshire.
Simpson, Mitchell, Edmondson, Slater, Abbott, West Riding Yorkshire.
Zelley, Eggleton, White, Lovell, Purchase, Dorset.
Neech, Suffolk, Norfolk.
Singleton, Surrey,
Eggleton, Buckingham/Surrey

Online BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,759
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Missing Ancestor's Birth
« Reply #15 on: Friday 11 November 16 10:51 GMT (UK) »
I've no idea, but try it.  When you open the reply box, underneath the box itself, there is "Attachments and other options"  Hit that and you have the option to choose your file and attach it.

Give it a go  ;D
Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Online heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 42,517
    • View Profile
Re: Missing Ancestor's Birth
« Reply #16 on: Saturday 12 November 16 00:49 GMT (UK) »
I just saw the marriage of Thomas Abbott to Rachel Atkinson - father Blakey Hartley.
Confusing isn't it  ???  :)
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Bram Taylor

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 284
    • View Profile
Re: Missing Ancestor's Birth
« Reply #17 on: Saturday 12 November 16 02:58 GMT (UK) »
Hi all and thanks for all the hard yards put in - I'm a bit overwhelmed but to take one point first, in the 1851 Census attached it shows Thomas as 'Un', not as assumed, 'Son'. Thanks Heywood, well spotted! Strangely, in the 1860 Census Thomas, still a Tailor has named his Son Blakey Hartley Abbott which implies there was some sort of affection shown here by Thomas for his former companions in the 1851?
That will help to answer your last (today) email, there was a deep bond of some sort?

Bram
Taylor, Baker, Milns, Bayley, Bailey, Evers, Shropshire.
Sewell, Prestidge, Northamptonshire.
Simpson, Mitchell, Edmondson, Slater, Abbott, West Riding Yorkshire.
Zelley, Eggleton, White, Lovell, Purchase, Dorset.
Neech, Suffolk, Norfolk.
Singleton, Surrey,
Eggleton, Buckingham/Surrey