Author Topic: GRO indexes on gro.gov.uk !  (Read 70640 times)

Offline jonwarrn

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 11,799
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: GRO indexes on gro.gov.uk !
« Reply #90 on: Friday 04 November 16 23:31 GMT (UK) »
That was what Louisa was looking for, not what you found. Anyway, never mind, glad you were able to help.
Perhaps she found this?
James Henry Ellis, birth registered Holborn, March 1874
mother's maiden surname Thompson

Offline Girl Guide

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,488
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: GRO indexes on gro.gov.uk !
« Reply #91 on: Friday 04 November 16 23:44 GMT (UK) »
Yes that is exactly what I found.  Louisa hadn't thought to switch the names round.
Ashford: Somerset, London
England: Devon, London, New Zealand
Holdway: Wiltshire
Hooper: Bristol, Somerset
Knowling: Devon, London
Southcott: Devon, China
Strong: Wiltshire
Watson: Cambridgeshire
White: Bristol
Windo - Gloucestershire, Somerset, Wiltshire

Offline Gan Yam

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 641
  • Going Home - exploring my past
    • View Profile
Re: GRO indexes on gro.gov.uk !
« Reply #92 on: Saturday 05 November 16 00:48 GMT (UK) »
I've searched for a couple of births and it hasn't given the mothers maiden name, some that I know the child was illegitimate and others were I didn't know. Is safe to assume that generally this is the case. No maiden name - illegitimate birth? Has anyone else found this?
J
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline GailB

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 411
    • View Profile
Re: GRO indexes on gro.gov.uk !
« Reply #93 on: Saturday 05 November 16 01:08 GMT (UK) »
I've searched for a couple of births and it hasn't given the mothers maiden name, some that I know the child was illegitimate and others were I didn't know. Is safe to assume that generally this is the case. No maiden name - illegitimate birth? Has anyone else found this?
J

Yes I have found the same thing
Armitage, Atherton, Barton, Beck, Bradshaw, Brumfitt, Chetwin, Conalty, Connolly, Connor(s), Davidson, Hilton, Hoey, Johnson, Jones, Knight, Lester, McDonald, Molyneux, Morris, Pownall, Rushton, Spark, Stanley, Tunstall, Welsby, West, Wharton, Williams, Wilson, Windridge, Windstandley


Offline lanercost

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 211
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: GRO indexes on gro.gov.uk !
« Reply #94 on: Saturday 05 November 16 01:45 GMT (UK) »
What does it mean when one of the children has a different mother's maiden name than the others??

Children proven by censuses and baptisms to belong to the correct parents but each child has Hearn as the mother's maiden name then one is Graves? And another family, all children have Glover as the mother's maiden name and one is Turrell? Weird.

Offline StevieSteve

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,679
    • View Profile
Re: GRO indexes on gro.gov.uk !
« Reply #95 on: Saturday 05 November 16 01:59 GMT (UK) »
Some possibilies are

1 The mother was previously married. Some births were registered using her maiden name, others under a previously married name

2 The GRO has made a transcription error

3 The record applies to a completely different child born in the same time and place while yours wasn't  registered for some reason

4 Your proof wasn't as proven as you thought
Middlesex: KING,  MUMFORD, COOK, ROUSE, GOODALL, BROWN
Oxford: MATTHEWS, MOSS
Kent: SPOONER, THOMAS, KILLICK, COLLINS
Cambs: PRIGG, LEACH
Hants: FOSTER
Montgomery: BREES
Surrey: REEVE

Offline lanercost

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 211
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: GRO indexes on gro.gov.uk !
« Reply #96 on: Saturday 05 November 16 02:24 GMT (UK) »
Some possibilies are

1 The mother was previously married. Some births were registered using her maiden name, others under a previously married name

2 The GRO has made a transcription error

3 The record applies to a completely different child born in the same time and place while yours wasn't  registered for some reason

4 Your proof wasn't as proven as you thought

Either 2 or 3. Thanks StevieSteve.

Offline TinaRoyal

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 146
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: GRO indexes on gro.gov.uk !
« Reply #97 on: Saturday 05 November 16 06:29 GMT (UK) »
I am using the new GRO facility to help identify children who were born and died in between Censuses.

I would be interested in knowing what different ways, others are using the facilities.

Offline LizzieL

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 9,096
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: GRO indexes on gro.gov.uk !
« Reply #98 on: Saturday 05 November 16 08:17 GMT (UK) »
I've confirmed an extra child of my great grandmother, who I only found must have existed when the 1911 census came out.
Berks / Oxon: Eltham, Annetts, Wiltshire (surname not county), Hawkins, Pembroke, Partridge
Dorset / Hants: Derham, Stride, Purkiss, Sibley
Yorkshire: Pottage, Carr, Blackburn, Depledge
Sussex: Goodyer, Christopher, Trevatt
Lanark: Scott (soldier went to Jersey CI)
Jersey: Fowler, Huelin, Scott