Author Topic: Great grand xxxx  (Read 2942 times)

Offline jaybelnz

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,762
  • My Runaway Bride! Thanks to Paula Too!
Re: Great grand xxxx
« Reply #9 on: Saturday 24 September 16 23:40 BST (UK) »
"We analyse the evidence to draw a conclusion. The better the sources and information, the stronger the evidence, which leads to a reliable conclusion!" Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk.

MATHEWS, Ireland, England, USA & Canada, NZ
FLEMING,   Ireland
DUNNELL,  England
PAULSON,  England
DOUGLAS, Scotland, Ireland, NZ
WALKER,   Scotland
WATSON,  England, Ayrshire, Scotland, NZ
McAUGHTRIE, Ayrshire, Scotland, NZ
MASON,     Scotland, England, NZ
& Connections

Offline Mike in Cumbria

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,782
Re: Great grand xxxx
« Reply #10 on: Sunday 25 September 16 09:26 BST (UK) »
Here's another reference

https://www.reference.com/family/difference-between-great-aunt-grand-aunt-352596743acb7109

Jeanne

But several of the pieces in there fall into the same trap, eg "However, the true technical term for this relationship is "grandaunt," while "great aunt" does not technically refer to any relationship.
"

or

"Although grand-aunt or uncle is the official title, grand-aunts and uncles are often referred to as great-aunts and uncles,"

Language isn't like that. Great-aunt, great-uncle, etc can not possibly be considered wrong when it is normal common parlance. In the UK, I have never ever heard of a grand-aunt, although I'm perfectly happy to believe that some areas of the country may use it.

Offline maddys52

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,822
  • Census information is Crown Copyright http://www.
Re: Great grand xxxx
« Reply #11 on: Sunday 25 September 16 09:33 BST (UK) »
Don't know that it's in common usage, but my daughter referred to someone yesterday as "grunkle" and "graunt".  ;) ;)

Offline Andrew Tarr

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,077
  • Wanted: Charles Percy Liversidge
Re: Great grand xxxx
« Reply #12 on: Sunday 25 September 16 09:33 BST (UK) »
Language isn't like that. Great-aunt, great-uncle, etc can not possibly be considered wrong when it is normal common parlance. In the UK, I have never ever heard of a grand-aunt, although I'm perfectly happy to believe that some areas of the country may use it.

Don't forget to allow for the long-standing influence of the US in all things genealogical.  Their conventions are often different from ours in the UK.
Tarr, Tydeman, Liversidge, Bartlett, Young


Offline jaybelnz

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,762
  • My Runaway Bride! Thanks to Paula Too!
Re: Great grand xxxx
« Reply #13 on: Sunday 25 September 16 09:50 BST (UK) »
Until I started with genealogy, I had never heard of "grand" aunts or uncles.  Only grandparents, great grandparents etc.
"We analyse the evidence to draw a conclusion. The better the sources and information, the stronger the evidence, which leads to a reliable conclusion!" Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk.

MATHEWS, Ireland, England, USA & Canada, NZ
FLEMING,   Ireland
DUNNELL,  England
PAULSON,  England
DOUGLAS, Scotland, Ireland, NZ
WALKER,   Scotland
WATSON,  England, Ayrshire, Scotland, NZ
McAUGHTRIE, Ayrshire, Scotland, NZ
MASON,     Scotland, England, NZ
& Connections

Offline Mike in Cumbria

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,782
Re: Great grand xxxx
« Reply #14 on: Sunday 25 September 16 09:50 BST (UK) »
Language isn't like that. Great-aunt, great-uncle, etc can not possibly be considered wrong when it is normal common parlance. In the UK, I have never ever heard of a grand-aunt, although I'm perfectly happy to believe that some areas of the country may use it.

Don't forget to allow for the long-standing influence of the US in all things genealogical.  Their conventions are often different from ours in the UK.

Yes, I'm sure that's the reason for the difference. It's (mildly) annoying to read that something is considered "wrong" when it clearly is just a difference between British and American English. In just the same way as when British English speakers complain about perfectly good AE words such as "gotten".

Offline frostyknight

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 354
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Re: Great grand xxxx
« Reply #15 on: Sunday 25 September 16 12:32 BST (UK) »
Growing up in Ireland, it was always grandaunt and granduncle. I had never heard of great aunt or great uncle until I started looking into the family tree. Frostyknight

Offline Andrew Tarr

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,077
  • Wanted: Charles Percy Liversidge
Re: Great grand xxxx
« Reply #16 on: Sunday 25 September 16 12:46 BST (UK) »
.... In just the same way as when British English speakers complain about perfectly good AE words such as "gotten".

I don't know who is 'wrong' here  :D  Brits still all say 'forgotten' and 'ill-gotten gains'.  Americans are more consistent (for a change  ;D ).
Tarr, Tydeman, Liversidge, Bartlett, Young