Author Topic: The look of your family tree  (Read 4345 times)

Offline jaybelnz

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,762
  • My Runaway Bride! Thanks to Paula Too!
    • View Profile
Re: The look of your family tree
« Reply #9 on: Monday 05 September 16 10:00 BST (UK) »
I always use Maiden names when I know them, otherwise, as with my 2 Irish 4x great grandparents, one is listed as Sarah Annie Unknown - and the other just Unknown, as I don't know her Christian name/s either.
"We analyse the evidence to draw a conclusion. The better the sources and information, the stronger the evidence, which leads to a reliable conclusion!" Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk.

MATHEWS, Ireland, England, USA & Canada, NZ
FLEMING,   Ireland
DUNNELL,  England
PAULSON,  England
DOUGLAS, Scotland, Ireland, NZ
WALKER,   Scotland
WATSON,  England, Ayrshire, Scotland, NZ
McAUGHTRIE, Ayrshire, Scotland, NZ
MASON,     Scotland, England, NZ
& Connections

Online rosie99

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 44,141
  • ALFIE 2009 - 2021 (Rosbercon Sky's the Limit)
    • View Profile
Re: The look of your family tree
« Reply #10 on: Monday 05 September 16 10:00 BST (UK) »
I have left Doreen with her maiden name rather than changing it to Bunch (where as Find My Past automatically changes it to Bunch)

FindMyPast has not changed womens maiden names to their married names on my tree  :-\
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline StevieSteve

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,679
    • View Profile
Re: The look of your family tree
« Reply #11 on: Monday 05 September 16 11:26 BST (UK) »
Pure speculation - I wonder if ftp overwrote an initial entry when adding a census or death
Middlesex: KING,  MUMFORD, COOK, ROUSE, GOODALL, BROWN
Oxford: MATTHEWS, MOSS
Kent: SPOONER, THOMAS, KILLICK, COLLINS
Cambs: PRIGG, LEACH
Hants: FOSTER
Montgomery: BREES
Surrey: REEVE

Offline Karen Lorraine

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 15
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The look of your family tree
« Reply #12 on: Monday 05 September 16 11:55 BST (UK) »
Thank you everyone!
With find my past - if you click on the hints for a person and then agree that they hint they have offered is correct you then click 'yes, next step' - then 'update' it automatically changed the maiden name to the husbands surname.  I am very new to this and it took me a while to realise you can update manually just those bits you wanted updating but just wondered what other did and thought about it :)
I just didn't want to lose the maiden names off of all my female relatives


Offline groom

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,147
  • Me aged 3. Tidied up thanks to Wiggy.
    • View Profile
Re: The look of your family tree
« Reply #13 on: Monday 05 September 16 12:12 BST (UK) »
I always use maiden names, otherwise it looks very odd e.g. Jane Smith daughter of John Brown! Surely you need a maiden name to be able to follow the family backwards?
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline DonnaA23

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 42
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The look of your family tree
« Reply #14 on: Tuesday 06 September 16 15:19 BST (UK) »
I always add the maiden names. ......And at Ancestry, most information I have tended to add manually, as opposed to automatically adding, because the leaf information is not always accurate by way of spelling mistakes, wrong dates and place names.

Online AntonyMMM

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,410
  • Researcher (retired) and former Deputy Registrar
    • View Profile
Re: The look of your family tree
« Reply #15 on: Tuesday 06 September 16 15:32 BST (UK) »
The convention would generally be to use the person's name at birth (not the maiden name).




Offline jaybelnz

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,762
  • My Runaway Bride! Thanks to Paula Too!
    • View Profile
Re: The look of your family tree
« Reply #16 on: Tuesday 06 September 16 22:50 BST (UK) »
 ??? Surely a women's name at birth is their maiden name?

"We analyse the evidence to draw a conclusion. The better the sources and information, the stronger the evidence, which leads to a reliable conclusion!" Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk.

MATHEWS, Ireland, England, USA & Canada, NZ
FLEMING,   Ireland
DUNNELL,  England
PAULSON,  England
DOUGLAS, Scotland, Ireland, NZ
WALKER,   Scotland
WATSON,  England, Ayrshire, Scotland, NZ
McAUGHTRIE, Ayrshire, Scotland, NZ
MASON,     Scotland, England, NZ
& Connections

Offline groom

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,147
  • Me aged 3. Tidied up thanks to Wiggy.
    • View Profile
Re: The look of your family tree
« Reply #17 on: Wednesday 07 September 16 00:17 BST (UK) »
??? Surely a women's name at birth is their maiden name?

That's what I always thought, although I see one definition is it is the name that she is known by before her marriage. In most cases that would be the same as her name at birth.
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk