Author Topic: Marriage St Pauls Hammersmith  (Read 1514 times)

Offline StevieSteve

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,679
    • View Profile
Re: Marriage St Pauls Hammersmith
« Reply #9 on: Sunday 14 August 16 00:37 BST (UK) »

Presumably no marriage date added in the margin as often appears against banns  :-\


No, but none of the others around it had anything like that either
Middlesex: KING,  MUMFORD, COOK, ROUSE, GOODALL, BROWN
Oxford: MATTHEWS, MOSS
Kent: SPOONER, THOMAS, KILLICK, COLLINS
Cambs: PRIGG, LEACH
Hants: FOSTER
Montgomery: BREES
Surrey: REEVE

Offline rosie99

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 44,171
  • ALFIE 2009 - 2021 (Rosbercon Sky's the Limit)
    • View Profile
Re: Marriage St Pauls Hammersmith
« Reply #10 on: Sunday 14 August 16 17:22 BST (UK) »

Presumably no marriage date added in the margin as often appears against banns  :-\


No, but none of the others around it had anything like that either

No proof then that they ever married  ???   I can't see evidence of either of them yet in 1851 census. Freebmd does not appear to have anything for any 'Issions'
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline StevieSteve

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,679
    • View Profile
Re: Marriage St Pauls Hammersmith
« Reply #11 on: Tuesday 16 August 16 07:48 BST (UK) »
As worldwide searches on the 2 big name sites doesn't seem to show up very much, I'd like to attach an image for possible reinterpretation but doesn't seem to be an option at the moment

Watch this space...

Middlesex: KING,  MUMFORD, COOK, ROUSE, GOODALL, BROWN
Oxford: MATTHEWS, MOSS
Kent: SPOONER, THOMAS, KILLICK, COLLINS
Cambs: PRIGG, LEACH
Hants: FOSTER
Montgomery: BREES
Surrey: REEVE

Offline StevieSteve

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,679
    • View Profile
Re: Marriage St Pauls Hammersmith
« Reply #12 on: Tuesday 16 August 16 08:02 BST (UK) »
Middlesex: KING,  MUMFORD, COOK, ROUSE, GOODALL, BROWN
Oxford: MATTHEWS, MOSS
Kent: SPOONER, THOMAS, KILLICK, COLLINS
Cambs: PRIGG, LEACH
Hants: FOSTER
Montgomery: BREES
Surrey: REEVE


Offline BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,742
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Marriage St Pauls Hammersmith
« Reply #13 on: Tuesday 16 August 16 08:28 BST (UK) »
Where there's a will...

http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=370538.msg6031014#msg6031014

I think that the reason why you could not add an attachment to this thread is because it is the "Look Up" section, which doesn't allow attachments. 
Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,742
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Marriage St Pauls Hammersmith
« Reply #14 on: Tuesday 16 August 16 08:32 BST (UK) »
The only reference to Sarah Gaish on FreeBMD (March 1847-December 1880) is the March quarter 1848 marriage in Kensington Registration District, which you say is the mother re-marrying.  And no entry for Isaac Issions at all.
Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline Suffolk Mawther

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,886
  • William & Eliza Fulker
    • View Profile
Re: Marriage St Pauls Hammersmith
« Reply #15 on: Sunday 23 October 16 13:10 BST (UK) »
Having looked at the image you have posted, I wonder why Isaac Issions' name has not been written with a long 'S' and a short 'S'? Could the second letter be something else? Perhaps an 'R'?

SM ...
Every time I find an ancestor,
I have to find two more!

SUFFOLK - Pendle, Stygall, Pipe, Fruer, Bridges, Fisk, Bellamy, Sparham - all link to  Framlingham 
DERBY - Bridges and Frost (originally Framlingham/Parham)
NOTTINGHAM - Lambert & Selby
BERKSHIRE/then Hammersmith LDN - Fulker
LDN/MDX - Murray, Clancy, Broker, Hoskins, Marsden, Wilson, Sale
 
GGfather Michael Wilson born Cork, lived Fulham London - moved to Boston USA 1889, what happened next?