Author Topic: Largest family you have found  (Read 8711 times)

Offline ..claire..

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,951
  • Genealogy...Life in the Past Lane
    • View Profile
Re: Largest family you have found
« Reply #27 on: Tuesday 09 August 16 13:55 BST (UK) »

Hi Alison Terao

Welcome to RootsChat  :)

All I can say is WOW :o :o
Luce, Tippett , Thomson, Dolling ~ Devon & Cornwall
Mocquard ~ London, France
Census info is Crown Copyright http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Andrew Tarr

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,029
  • Wanted: Charles Percy Liversidge
    • View Profile
Re: Largest family you have found
« Reply #28 on: Tuesday 09 August 16 17:25 BST (UK) »
One of my ancestors had 25 children.

He died at 85 with all his faculties intact.

Some more than others, by the look of it ....  ;)
Tarr, Tydeman, Liversidge, Bartlett, Young

Offline ..claire..

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,951
  • Genealogy...Life in the Past Lane
    • View Profile
Re: Largest family you have found
« Reply #29 on: Tuesday 09 August 16 17:28 BST (UK) »

 ::) ;D ;D ;D
Luce, Tippett , Thomson, Dolling ~ Devon & Cornwall
Mocquard ~ London, France
Census info is Crown Copyright http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Annette7

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,015
    • View Profile
Re: Largest family you have found
« Reply #30 on: Wednesday 10 August 16 01:23 BST (UK) »
One of my ancestors had 25 children.

He died at 85 with all his faculties intact.

Some more than others, by the look of it ....  ;)

Not quite the same though, is it?   - the other large families shown here have all had the same mother!

Annette

PS Working on a tree for a friend yesterday and one particular couple had 18 children at Bressingham, Norfolk between 1859 and 1888.
Scopes (One-Name Study - Worldwide)
Suffolk - Grist, Knights, Bullenthorpe, Watcham
Scotland - Spence, Horne, Cowan, Moffat
London -  Monk

Don't walk behind me, I may not lead.   Don't walk in front of me, I may not follow.   Just walk beside me and be my friend.

Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline Rosinish

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,241
  • PASSED & PAST
    • View Profile
Re: Largest family you have found
« Reply #31 on: Wednesday 10 August 16 01:55 BST (UK) »
Not quite the same though, is it?   - the other large families shown here have all had the same mother!

Annette

Annette, I agree regarding "A" couple who have been together throughout.

A man could have had several younger wives & produce many kids but a woman can only produce for a certain length of time i.e. 2nd/3rd marriages don't fit the bill really (for either)

Annie
South Uist, Inverness-shire, Scotland:- Bowie, Campbell, Cumming, Currie

Ireland:- Cullen, Flannigan (Derry), Donahoe/Donaghue (variants) (Cork), McCrate (Tipperary), Mellon, Tol(l)and (Donegal & Tyrone)

Newcastle-on-Tyne/Durham (Northumberland):- Harrison, Jude, Kemp, Lunn, Mellon, Robson, Stirling

Kettering, Northampton:- MacKinnon

Canada:- Callaghan, Cumming, MacPhee

"OLD GENEALOGISTS NEVER DIE - THEY JUST LOSE THEIR CENSUS"

Offline clairec666

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,119
  • My great-great-grandfather in his signalbox
    • View Profile
Re: Largest family you have found
« Reply #32 on: Wednesday 10 August 16 06:17 BST (UK) »
Wow, 25 is amazing!

My 3x-great grandfather had at least 18 with 2 wives.

Best record to the same couple is 14 (to another set of 3x gg). All survived infancy, two died in late childhood, and the rest lived to adulthood.
Transcribing Essex records for FreeREG.
Current parishes - Burnham, Purleigh, Steeple.
Get in touch if you have any interest in these places!

Offline Alison Terao

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 7
    • View Profile
Re: Largest family you have found
« Reply #33 on: Wednesday 10 August 16 12:15 BST (UK) »
One of my ancestors had 25 children.

He died at 85 with all his faculties intact.

Some more than others, by the look of it ....  ;)

My father's maiden aunt - his g-granddaughter  (herself one of 11 - 10 surviving who she raised when her mother died) used to say "they should have put a blue ribbon on it" 8)

Offline Alison Terao

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 7
    • View Profile
Re: Largest family you have found
« Reply #34 on: Wednesday 10 August 16 12:27 BST (UK) »
One of my ancestors had 25 children.

He died at 85 with all his faculties intact.

Some more than others, by the look of it ....  ;)

Not quite the same though, is it?   - the other large families shown here have all had the same mother!

That's true - and if you look at the children of the first wife only it drops to 15, which is still pretty impressive.

They were a fertile and hardy lot that line - they had large families with a good survival rate.


Offline Lisajb

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,246
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Largest family you have found
« Reply #35 on: Wednesday 10 August 16 13:17 BST (UK) »
My great grandfather Albert Barnett had two children with 1st wife Matilda, married again after her death and produced another 13 with second wife Margaret.
Mullingar, Westmeath Ireland: Gilligan/Wall/Meagher/Maher/Gray/O'Hara/Corroon (various spellings)
Bristol: Woodman/James/Derrick
Bristol/Somerset: Saunders/Wilmot
Gloucestershire:Woodman/Mathews/Tandy/Stinchcombe/Marten/Thompson
Wiltshire: Mathews
Carmarthen: Thomas, Lewis
Australia: Mary Lewis, transportee, married Henry Brown - what happened to her?