Author Topic: 45 Percival Street, Chorlton on Medlock in 1922  (Read 1821 times)

Offline Jazgran

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 187
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
45 Percival Street, Chorlton on Medlock in 1922
« on: Friday 13 May 16 11:26 BST (UK) »
Please, can anyone tell me what kind of establishment was at the above address in 1922?

Offline Ro net

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 22
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 45 Percival Street, Chorlton on Medlock in 1922
« Reply #1 on: Tuesday 17 May 16 20:57 BST (UK) »
not too sure, but will ask relatives my brother and i were born at 67 Percival st and went to school  at Mansfield st. I know facing us was a coalyard. will reply asap. ro net

Offline stanmapstone

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,798
    • View Profile
Re: 45 Percival Street, Chorlton on Medlock in 1922
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday 17 May 16 22:29 BST (UK) »
In the 1911 Census  45 Percival Street was a private house.

Stan
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline stanmapstone

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,798
    • View Profile
Re: 45 Percival Street, Chorlton on Medlock in 1922
« Reply #3 on: Tuesday 17 May 16 22:45 BST (UK) »
Manchester Courier and Lancashire General Advertiser - Saturday 25 February 1905
Lot 2. Eight Dwelling Houses and Builders Yard, situate and numbered 41 to 57 (odd numbers inclusive) in Percival Street, off Brunswick Street, Ardwick........
(a) Two Dwelling Houses and Builder's Yard, numbered 41, 43, and 45 Percival Street. Apportioned chief rent, £12. Gross annual rent, £39.


Stan
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline Jazgran

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 187
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 45 Percival Street, Chorlton on Medlock in 1922
« Reply #4 on: Saturday 11 June 16 20:29 BST (UK) »
Thank you to all contributors.   The year of 1922 was particularly relevant to this search, but I appreciate all responses.
Jazgran