Pages: 1 2 3 [4]

Author Topic: re Mary holmes (nee lightfoot)  (Read 1973 times)

Offline BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,743
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: re Mary holmes (nee lightfoot)
« Reply #27 on: Friday 15 April 16 09:47 BST (UK) »
Looks good!   :)
Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline garstonite

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,013
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: re Mary holmes (nee lightfoot)
« Reply #28 on: Friday 15 April 16 09:53 BST (UK) »
Agree - Croley is obviously Crowley - which Bumble has pointed out is covered by that Warrington list but it is confusing
oakes,liverpool..neston..backford..poulton cum spittal(bebington)middlewich,cheshire......   sacht,helgoland  .......merrick,herefordshire adams,shropshire...tipping..ellis..  jones,garston,liverpool..hartley.dunham massey..barker. salford

Offline Jeni63

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 67
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: re Mary holmes (nee lightfoot)
« Reply #29 on: Friday 15 April 16 10:43 BST (UK) »
 :) :) that's brilliant.   It certainly seems to all fit.  I have so wanted to find her and what happened.  Holmes is such a common name in those parts.  So next step is to order death certificate. 
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]