RootsChat.Com
home
forum
Help
Search
Calendar
Login
Register
RootsChat.Com
»
England (Counties as in 1851-1901)
»
England
»
Kent
»
Kent Lookup Requests
»
Marriage Chistlet,Kent......
Print
Reply
Pages: [
1
]
Author
Topic: Marriage Chistlet,Kent...... (Read 1140 times)
juliew
RootsChat Member
Posts: 112
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Marriage Chistlet,Kent......
«
on:
Thursday 24 March 16 19:46 GMT (UK) »
21 July 1839. I do have the marriage certificate but would like a look up of the parish register if possible as I have a query.
Groom - Ambrose Kite
Bride - Mary Curtis
Thanks.
Sorry mods looks like I've posted in the wrong place. Could you please move to the correct board.
Jebber
RootsChat Marquessate
Posts: 5,660
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Re: Marriage Chistlet,Kent......
«
Reply #1 on:
Thursday 24 March 16 20:03 GMT (UK) »
What is your question?
CHOULES All , COKER Harwich Essex & Rochester Kent
COLE Gt. Oakley, & Lt. Oakley, Essex.
DUNCAN Kent
EVERITT Colchester, Dovercourt & Harwich Essex
GULLIVER/GULLOFER Fifehead Magdalen Dorset
HORSCROFT Kent.
KING Sturminster Newton, Dorset. MONK Odiham Ham.
SCOTT Wrabness, Essex
WILKINS Stour Provost, Dorset.
WICKHAM All in North Essex.
WICKHAM Medway Towns, Kent from 1880
WICKHAM, Ipswich, Suffolk.
juliew
RootsChat Member
Posts: 112
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Re: Marriage Chistlet,Kent......
«
Reply #2 on:
Thursday 24 March 16 20:13 GMT (UK) »
Hi,
The query is that the brides fathers name isn't included on the marriage certificate and would like a look up of the original parish register as there may have been a mistake made when transferring the details to the marriage certificate.
Jebber
RootsChat Marquessate
Posts: 5,660
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Re: Marriage Chistlet,Kent......
«
Reply #3 on:
Thursday 24 March 16 20:18 GMT (UK) »
No, no father named for the bride. She may have been illegitimate but not necessarily so, I have a marriage where no father is shown for bride or groom in the PR's, yet both were alive and well
Jebber
CHOULES All , COKER Harwich Essex & Rochester Kent
COLE Gt. Oakley, & Lt. Oakley, Essex.
DUNCAN Kent
EVERITT Colchester, Dovercourt & Harwich Essex
GULLIVER/GULLOFER Fifehead Magdalen Dorset
HORSCROFT Kent.
KING Sturminster Newton, Dorset. MONK Odiham Ham.
SCOTT Wrabness, Essex
WILKINS Stour Provost, Dorset.
WICKHAM All in North Essex.
WICKHAM Medway Towns, Kent from 1880
WICKHAM, Ipswich, Suffolk.
juliew
RootsChat Member
Posts: 112
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Re: Marriage Chistlet,Kent......
«
Reply #4 on:
Thursday 24 March 16 20:21 GMT (UK) »
Hi,
Thank you. I think it was a mistake but will probably never be 100 percent sure.
Jebber
RootsChat Marquessate
Posts: 5,660
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Re: Marriage Chistlet,Kent......
«
Reply #5 on:
Thursday 24 March 16 20:24 GMT (UK) »
The way it is written it is just possible that deceased refers to the bride's father not the groom's. If so, it is possible the minister may not have bothered to enter the name, or the bride simply did not give it.
CHOULES All , COKER Harwich Essex & Rochester Kent
COLE Gt. Oakley, & Lt. Oakley, Essex.
DUNCAN Kent
EVERITT Colchester, Dovercourt & Harwich Essex
GULLIVER/GULLOFER Fifehead Magdalen Dorset
HORSCROFT Kent.
KING Sturminster Newton, Dorset. MONK Odiham Ham.
SCOTT Wrabness, Essex
WILKINS Stour Provost, Dorset.
WICKHAM All in North Essex.
WICKHAM Medway Towns, Kent from 1880
WICKHAM, Ipswich, Suffolk.
juliew
RootsChat Member
Posts: 112
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Re: Marriage Chistlet,Kent......
«
Reply #6 on:
Thursday 24 March 16 20:34 GMT (UK) »
Hi,
Exactly what I thought grooms father died in 1825.
Print
Reply
Pages: [
1
]
RootsChat.Com
»
England (Counties as in 1851-1901)
»
England
»
Kent
»
Kent Lookup Requests
»
Marriage Chistlet,Kent......