Author Topic: Chancery Mary Wrixon v Richard Wrixon Lands in Yetminster, Dorset. 1670  (Read 4759 times)

Offline horselydown86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,769
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Chancery Mary Wrixon v Richard Wrixon Lands in Yetminster, Dorset. 1670
« Reply #18 on: Monday 28 March 16 04:25 BST (UK) »
Line 73: ...Plucknett...
Line 74  to sue forth...
Line 75: ...designed noe benefitt...
Line 77:  ...before the sealeing thereof
Line 81:  lymme and others and that att the...
Line 82:  ...and denied he was... (same word as Line 78)
Line 89:  thereof Itt is therefore... (It's the same letter as seen on Joynt and Ireland, being the I/J)
Line 95:  decreed that...
Line 96:  ...accompt for...
Line 98: one of the M(aste)res of this Court and to p(er)mitt...
Line 99:  ...Oldish...
Line 100: ...the said M(aste)r is to...
Line 101: ...as the said M(aste)r ^shall report due to the said Compl(aynan)t & the said [Master?]^ is to [?*] the said tenn...
Line 102: ...noe deducc(i)on...m(aste)r...
Line 103: m(aste)r doe allow...
Line 104: and that the said...

This word (or words) is beyond me.  It may start with s.  It may that there are two words - the second being yt = (th)(a)t.

see that would fit, but I don't believe they are e's.

Offline horselydown86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,769
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Chancery Mary Wrixon v Richard Wrixon Lands in Yetminster, Dorset. 1670
« Reply #19 on: Monday 28 March 16 04:30 BST (UK) »
Trudy, may I ask by what process you were able to obtain a Decree of Chancery?

I have ordered many Bills and Answers from TNA, but have never seen a decree catalogued.

Did you have to search for it in person?

Offline Bookbox

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,308
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Chancery Mary Wrixon v Richard Wrixon Lands in Yetminster, Dorset. 1670
« Reply #20 on: Monday 28 March 16 13:10 BST (UK) »
HD, for your information, my reply on another thread ...
http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=744933.msg5920552#msg5920552

Offline tnorbury

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 102
  • A growing family tree
    • View Profile
Re: Chancery Mary Wrixon v Richard Wrixon Lands in Yetminster, Dorset. 1670
« Reply #21 on: Tuesday 29 March 16 04:10 BST (UK) »
Trudy, may I ask by what process you were able to obtain a Decree of Chancery?

Well, I first read about it in the book

History and Genealogy of the Pomeroy Family: Colateral Lines in Family Groups, Normandy, Great Britain and America; Comprising the Ancestors and Descendants of Eltweed Pomeroy from Beaminster, County Dorset, England, 1630, Part 3
Albert Alonzo Pomeroy
Franklin printing and engraving Company, 1922

on google books https://books.google.com/books?id=m5NIAAAAMAAJ&dq=Richard+Wrixon&source=gbs_navlinks_s

It as a short review

Chancery Deposition W. 725-78. 25 June 20 Charles II. Mary Wrixon widow vs. Richard Wrixon. She was widow of Xpofer Wrixon. Sale by latter of tenement in Yetminster to Giles Symme etc.

When I put Mary Wrixon widow vs. Richard Wrixon on google it came right up with, as Bookbox mentioned, link to the Waalt Project at Univeristy of Houston.  http://www.uh.edu/waalt/index.php/C78_1670

Thank you again for your help, I have yet to add the last section to my information, when I have I will upload the document to here.
CHICK, CHUBB, CLOTHIER, GALE, DOBLE, PIDGEON, GLOYNES


Offline horselydown86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,769
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Chancery Mary Wrixon v Richard Wrixon Lands in Yetminster, Dorset. 1670
« Reply #22 on: Tuesday 29 March 16 05:28 BST (UK) »
Thank you, Trudy, for this information.

Offline tnorbury

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 102
  • A growing family tree
    • View Profile
Re: Chancery Mary Wrixon v Richard Wrixon Lands in Yetminster, Dorset. 1670
« Reply #23 on: Wednesday 30 March 16 02:13 BST (UK) »

[/b]Line 101: ...as the said M(aste)r ^shall report due to the said Compl(aynan)t & the said [Master?]^ is to [?*] the said tenn...


I have been considering this.  Could it be

[line 101] such arreares as the said M(aste)r shall report due(ly) to the said Compl(aynan)t & the said Master of is to suvity [surety] the said ten pound(es) p(er) ann(um) be settled by security
CHICK, CHUBB, CLOTHIER, GALE, DOBLE, PIDGEON, GLOYNES

Offline horselydown86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,769
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Chancery Mary Wrixon v Richard Wrixon Lands in Yetminster, Dorset. 1670
« Reply #24 on: Wednesday 30 March 16 03:25 BST (UK) »

I have been considering this.  Could it be

[line 101] such arreares as the said M(aste)r shall report due(ly) to the said Compl(aynan)t & the said Master of is to suvity [surety] the said ten pound(es) p(er) ann(um) be settled by security

Hi Trudy,

I am a bit doubtful of this reading.  The upward flourish on the v (in mid-word positions) normally starts from the left arm of the v.  On what I believe is the second letter here, it starts from the right arm.  So while it does look somewhat like a v, I'm sceptical.

Perhaps someone else has a suggestion for this word (or words)?

PS:  By the way, I can't agree with your reading of due(ly).  In my opinion the word is due = owing.

Offline tnorbury

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 102
  • A growing family tree
    • View Profile
Re: Chancery Mary Wrixon v Richard Wrixon Lands in Yetminster, Dorset. 1670
« Reply #25 on: Wednesday 30 March 16 04:06 BST (UK) »
I was not sure about the mark after the e on due, you are right it is due.

Well if it is not a v the only other idea I have is that the Master would certify the orders of the court!
CHICK, CHUBB, CLOTHIER, GALE, DOBLE, PIDGEON, GLOYNES

Offline Bookbox

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,308
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Chancery Mary Wrixon v Richard Wrixon Lands in Yetminster, Dorset. 1670
« Reply #26 on: Wednesday 30 March 16 12:57 BST (UK) »
Perhaps someone else has a suggestion for this word (or words)?
I believe it's two words - a short (or contracted) verb starting with s... or d..., followed by yt = that.