Author Topic: reasonably well known relative.  (Read 4922 times)

Offline rachelralph

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,081
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
reasonably well known relative.
« on: Friday 18 March 16 09:21 GMT (UK) »
i decided that the only way i was going to find out the mysteries surrounding some of my ancestors was to start with what i knew and work from there. i knew who my great nanny was and i knew all of her siblings. i also knew most of her siblings spouses. there are lots of mysteries like where did so and so go? why did they change their name? how did they get there etc. my idea was to trace each sibling and follow the line down to each living descendant and then maybe contact them saying "hello we have a shared great great grandfather, do you know anything about...."

the thing is now i have come across as living person who is reasonably well known. ie his name does appear in the papers from time to time and he is definitely well known within his own circle. i didnt realise who he was at first. i found him on fb and sent him a message hoping he would see it and get back to me. i then went away and had a look online for any info about this person (nosy i guess) as soon as i googled his name loads came up about his achievements and his career, plus some newspaper stories about him.

i now feel like a complete wally because when i messaged him i didnt realise this and i just prattled on and on about who i was and who our shared ancestor was and what info i would love to have if he knew it. i didnt for one minute think he was possibly who he is. now i dont know whether to message him again telling him im not some freak who randomly messages people. i dont want him to think im a stalker or anything haha.

so what should i do?
Ralph. Lever. Young. Lasham. Denigan. Sawyer. Moore. Stone

saville foljambe moore

Offline lizdb

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,307
    • View Profile
Re: reasonably well known relative.
« Reply #1 on: Friday 18 March 16 09:27 GMT (UK) »
Wait and see if he responds , just the same as you would if you hadn't found he was "famous".

If your research thus far that you have shared with him is sound, and if he has any interest in pursuing it, then the fact that he is "famous" should make no difference at all to this, should it?

If, after a while (and, like any of us he may of course be a busy man) , you get no response then you will need to think if or how you will follow it up - the same as if you didn't get a response but had not discovered his "fame".
Edmonds/Edmunds - mainly Sussex
DeBoo - London
Green - Suffolk
Parker - Sussex
Kemp - Essex
Farrington - Essex
Boniface - West Sussex

census information is Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Marmalady

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,733
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: reasonably well known relative.
« Reply #2 on: Friday 18 March 16 09:31 GMT (UK) »
Agree with Liz

Just wait and see if he responds

If he is interested in your shared ancestry, he will reply, if he isn't, he won't

His fame has nothing to do with your relationship -- and for all you know he might be thrilled receiving a communication that treats him just like any other "normal" person!
Wainwright - Yorkshire
Whitney - Herefordshire
Watson -  Northamptonshire
Trant - Yorkshire
Helps - all
Needham - Derbyshire
Waterhouse - Derbyshire
Northing - all

Offline clairec666

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,116
  • My great-great-grandfather in his signalbox
    • View Profile
Re: reasonably well known relative.
« Reply #3 on: Friday 18 March 16 09:43 GMT (UK) »
He probably hasn't seen your message to be honest, it'll get lost amongst the other "wallies" messaging him for other reasons!

Maybe he's seen your message, and isn't interested in genealogy, in which case, more fool him. He doesn't know what he's missing :)

Hopefully some of the other relatives you've found will be able to help you instead.
Transcribing Essex records for FreeREG.
Current parishes - Burnham, Purleigh, Steeple.
Get in touch if you have any interest in these places!


Offline rachelralph

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,081
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: reasonably well known relative.
« Reply #4 on: Friday 18 March 16 10:10 GMT (UK) »
i hadnt really thought of it like this. i was so caught up in "Blimey hes famous" that i hadnt really stopped to think that actually hes just human too. daft teenage moment there i guess  ::) ;D

sadly there is no one left to answer any questions. well actually there might be but if there is i cant find them seeing as a few of the gentleman dissappered in the 1950's. they most likely have new lives with new children somehwere but i dont think i will ever find them.

hopefully this person will get back to me.
Ralph. Lever. Young. Lasham. Denigan. Sawyer. Moore. Stone

saville foljambe moore

Offline clairec666

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,116
  • My great-great-grandfather in his signalbox
    • View Profile
Re: reasonably well known relative.
« Reply #5 on: Friday 18 March 16 10:13 GMT (UK) »
There's always a chance he'll sign up for Who Do You Think You Are.... then all your questions may be answered!
Transcribing Essex records for FreeREG.
Current parishes - Burnham, Purleigh, Steeple.
Get in touch if you have any interest in these places!

Offline StevieSteve

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,679
    • View Profile
Re: reasonably well known relative.
« Reply #6 on: Friday 18 March 16 12:46 GMT (UK) »
I've got a similar problem in that one of my relatives is quite high up in the academic world and the only contact address I've seen is one at the University. I've started writing a mail but have come to the conclusion that there's too fine a line between legitimate family history research and stalking when it comes to living relatives

Here's my draft:

Dear Prof X, hope you don't mind me using your work email

My name's StevieSteve and I'm researching our family tree. I'm actually your 2nd cousin once removed. It may sound remote but in fact my Mum went to your 21st birthday party though she didn't enjoy it. Or like you very much, to be honest.

I wonder if it would be possible to meet up as I'd really like some insight into your side of the family.

I see your daughter is back to using her maiden name. Didn't the marriage work out or is there another reason?

Looks like your granddaughter is having fun at university according to her facebook page! You must be very proud. Well, most of the time, anyway :-)

Look forward to hearing from you



Think it might need a tweak or two.
Middlesex: KING,  MUMFORD, COOK, ROUSE, GOODALL, BROWN
Oxford: MATTHEWS, MOSS
Kent: SPOONER, THOMAS, KILLICK, COLLINS
Cambs: PRIGG, LEACH
Hants: FOSTER
Montgomery: BREES
Surrey: REEVE

Offline Mike in Cumbria

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,776
    • View Profile
Re: reasonably well known relative.
« Reply #7 on: Friday 18 March 16 12:50 GMT (UK) »
I've got a similar problem in that one of my relatives is quite high up in the academic world and the only contact address I've seen is one at the University. I've started writing a mail but have come to the conclusion that there's too fine a line between legitimate family history research and stalking when it comes to living relatives

Here's my draft:

Dear Prof X, hope you don't mind me using your work email

My name's StevieSteve and I'm researching our family tree. I'm actually your 2nd cousin once removed. It may sound remote but in fact my Mum went to your 21st birthday party though she didn't enjoy it. Or like you very much, to be honest.

I wonder if it would be possible to meet up as I'd really like some insight into your side of the family.

I see your daughter is back to using her maiden name. Didn't the marriage work out or is there another reason?

Looks like your granddaughter is having fun at university according to her facebook page! You must be very proud. Well, most of the time, anyway :-)

Look forward to hearing from you



Think it might need a tweak or two.

That should work.

Offline davidft

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,209
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: reasonably well known relative.
« Reply #8 on: Friday 18 March 16 13:10 GMT (UK) »

My name's StevieSteve and I'm researching our family tree. I'm actually your 2nd cousin once removed. It may sound remote but in fact my Mum went to your 21st birthday party though she didn't enjoy it. Or like you very much, to be honest.

I wonder if it would be possible to meet up as I'd really like some insight into your side of the family.

I see your daughter is back to using her maiden name. Didn't the marriage work out or is there another reason?

Looks like your granddaughter is having fun at university according to her facebook page! You must be very proud. Well, most of the time, anyway :-)


Think it might need a tweak or two.

I would be absolutely horrified if i got a message along those lines. Its very rude and doesn't convey a very good impression of you in my opinion.

As to a tweak I would suggest just bin it and if you really want to contact the person start again.
James Stott c1775-1850. James was born in Yorkshire but where? He was a stonemason and married Elizabeth Archer (nee Nicholson) in 1794 at Ripon. They lived thereafter in Masham. If anyone has any suggestions or leads as to his birthplace I would be interested to know. I have searched for it for years without success. Thank you.