Taylor from Lancashire

[daniel3140]

Don't believe the Glodwick James is correct. I think it's the second James in the next post, born 20 Jun 1799 in Oldham.

[Radcliff]

assuming they stayed there a little while

Glodwick
all St Mary Oldham
John and Sarah
James 9th April 1798
Hannah,29th December 1799
John Buckley,22nd April 1804
Sarah 8th December 1805

[Radcliff]

I can not assume which one is yours,
there are a lot of Taylors in the area,

[Radcliff]

so which James is yours in  reference to area of Oldham
you have a date for them but nothing to weld them together

[daniel3140]

The common link between John and James is parents named John and Sarah, born in Oldham, both Independent denomination.

[daniel3140]

Here are two very similar Ann (Nanny?) Robinson's, both born in Oldham to a Thomas and Sarah Robinson, almost exactly 1 year apart, both of Cleggs(?). I would have thought the same married couple had daughter that did not survive, and then had an second daughter and gave her the same name. Appears this is not the case, as the first Ann, born 1801, was baptized in 1803. Second Ann was born and baptized in 1802. Any thoughts about what is going on? I know these are all common names, but is this really a coincidence that there are two Thomas and Sarah's of Clegg area of Oldham that both gave birth to an Ann one year apart?

Ann #1
First name(s)   Ann
Last name   Robinson
Birth year   1801
Birth date   30 Jul 1801
Baptism year   1803
Baptism date   14 Aug 1803
Place   Oldham
Denomination   Independent
Father's first name(s)   Thomas
Mother's first name(s)   Sarah
County   Lancashire

Ann #2
First name(s)   Ann
Last name   Robinson
Birth year   1802
Birth date   21 Jul 1802
Baptism year   1802
Baptism date   30 Oct 1802
Place   Oldham
Denomination   Independent
Father's first name(s)   Thomas
Mother's first name(s)   Sarah
County   Lancashire
Country   England

[sallyyorks]

Thanks for that. The son, James*** was born Jun 1799, so seems likely they would have had to marry sometime in 1798... or earlier if there are other children I have not come across.


***assuming he was, in fact, a son...I am only 100% certain of the son John, and James seems very likely due to common location/parents names on baptismal records or John and James...

I would not dismiss the record rosie posted completely
People did marry when they were pregnant or already had illegitimate children, especially in the late 1700's.