« Reply #158 on: Wednesday 03 February 16 21:04 GMT (UK) »
My DNA was taken professionally as part of a medical university study as I carry a rare disease, but the professor still wants as many birth death and marriage records as possible as part of the study. DNA is not being used in isolation.
I stopped reading here as it touched on a point I wanted to make. If it has already been raised I apologise.
This is close to what my feelings about DNA are. I don't see it as the be-all and end-all of Family Research but another tool to be used -
in conjunction- with the paper records
If I had the opportunity to buy a certificate that cleared up a brickwall I would do so. If the cost was prohibitive I would know I have the opportunity to do so in the future. By buying the certificate I would still put it in its place with ALL the other certificates etc I have and determine the whole picture.
And Davidft gave an excellent summary of my fears and doubts about the charlatans that ''ethnic DNA'' has given rise to.
Genealogy-Its a family thing
Paternal: Gibbins,McNamara, Jenkins, Schumann, Inwood, Sheehan, Quinlan, Tierney, Cole
Maternal: Munn, Simpson , Brighton, Clayfield, Westmacott, Corbell, Hatherell, Blacksell/Blackstone, Boothey , Muirhead
Son: Bull, Kneebone, Lehmann, Cronin, Fowler, Yates, Biglands, Rix, Carpenter, Pethick, Carrick, Male, London, Jacka, Tilbrook, Scott, Hampshire, Buckley
Brickwalls- Schumann, Simpson,Westmacott/Wennicot
Scott, Cronin
Gedmatch Kit : T812072