Author Topic: Are there any surnames you definitely DO NOT want to find in your family tree?  (Read 8969 times)

Offline Flattybasher9

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,364
  • Manners cost nothing, and are worth the effort.
    • View Profile
Re: Are there any surnames you definitely DO NOT want to find in your family tree?
« Reply #45 on: Sunday 07 February 16 15:17 GMT (UK) »
One name I can think of is "Hoodie".

Regards

Malky

Offline Ayashi

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,930
  • Lost in the DNA rabbit hole
    • View Profile
Re: Are there any surnames you definitely DO NOT want to find in your family tree?
« Reply #46 on: Sunday 07 February 16 19:15 GMT (UK) »
One name I can think of is "Hoodie".

Regards

Malky

Even if his first name was Robin?  ;)

Offline a chesters

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,157
    • View Profile
Re: Are there any surnames you definitely DO NOT want to find in your family tree?
« Reply #47 on: Monday 08 February 16 04:11 GMT (UK) »
Before I was bribed to depart from work, I tried once to email my supervisor. I could not, as his name was Alistair. He told me, when I spoke to him personally, that there were 22 spelling for his name :o :o :o :o

No wonder I could not email him.

Offline pharmaT

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,343
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Are there any surnames you definitely DO NOT want to find in your family tree?
« Reply #48 on: Monday 08 February 16 11:07 GMT (UK) »
I don't think there are any name that I would be bothered about having in my tree because even if there is a bad person with that name, they weren't/aren't me and I'm not responsible for what they do or have done.

I have decided however that it should be law to give middle names and perhaps 2 middle names if you have a surname like Smith  ;)
Campbell, Dunn, Dickson, Fell, Forest, Norie, Pratt, Somerville, Thompson, Tyler among others


Offline Andrew Tarr

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,014
  • Wanted: Charles Percy Liversidge
    • View Profile
Re: Are there any surnames you definitely DO NOT want to find in your family tree?
« Reply #49 on: Monday 08 February 16 12:54 GMT (UK) »
In some ways a frequently occuring name is better as it presents more of a challenge, therefore is more rewarding to research.

And (of course) easier to go up blind alleys ...  :)
Tarr, Tydeman, Liversidge, Bartlett, Young

Offline pharmaT

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,343
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Are there any surnames you definitely DO NOT want to find in your family tree?
« Reply #50 on: Monday 08 February 16 15:15 GMT (UK) »
In some ways a frequently occuring name is better as it presents more of a challenge, therefore is more rewarding to research.

And (of course) easier to go up blind alleys ...  :)

You'd think so but I have an unusual name in my tree and it's caused me as much confusion as my Smiths have. When (if) I eventually untangle them I will be very satisfied.
Campbell, Dunn, Dickson, Fell, Forest, Norie, Pratt, Somerville, Thompson, Tyler among others

Offline clairec666

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,116
  • My great-great-grandfather in his signalbox
    • View Profile
Re: Are there any surnames you definitely DO NOT want to find in your family tree?
« Reply #51 on: Monday 08 February 16 16:16 GMT (UK) »
In some ways a frequently occuring name is better as it presents more of a challenge, therefore is more rewarding to research.

And (of course) easier to go up blind alleys ...  :)

You'd think so but I have an unusual name in my tree and it's caused me as much confusion as my Smiths have. When (if) I eventually untangle them I will be very satisfied.

Same here, with the never-ending variations of spelling of the name "Moul".... it's a fun challenge though :)
Transcribing Essex records for FreeREG.
Current parishes - Burnham, Purleigh, Steeple.
Get in touch if you have any interest in these places!

Offline Clarkey500

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 377
  • Flag of Somerset
    • View Profile
Re: Are there any surnames you definitely DO NOT want to find in your family tree?
« Reply #52 on: Monday 08 February 16 16:34 GMT (UK) »
In some ways a frequently occuring name is better as it presents more of a challenge, therefore is more rewarding to research.

And (of course) easier to go up blind alleys ...  :)

You'd think so but I have an unusual name in my tree and it's caused me as much confusion as my Smiths have. When (if) I eventually untangle them I will be very satisfied.

Same here, with the never-ending variations of spelling of the name "Moul".... it's a fun challenge though :)

I do like an unusual name as it gives more variety. Yeah my Maul clan have thrown up a variety of variants as well but that's part of the fun!  ;D  Where did yours come from?
Devon: Bibby, Bird, Chaplin, Davey, Littlejohns, Pope, Shire, Sloman, Tucker
Dorset: Gauler
Gloucestershire: Gauler
Hampshire: Kimber
London: Crump, Gauler
Middlesex: Crump
Monmouthshire: Brunt
Northumberland: Bibby
Somerset: Clarke, Dibble, Duddridge, Parsons, Pool, Poole, Shire, Silvester
Surrey: Clarke
Wiltshire: Gauler

GEDmatch (myself): A869547
GEDmatch (my maternal grandfather):A933749
GEDmatch (my maternal grandmother): NY7596565

Offline clairec666

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,116
  • My great-great-grandfather in his signalbox
    • View Profile
Re: Are there any surnames you definitely DO NOT want to find in your family tree?
« Reply #53 on: Monday 08 February 16 16:39 GMT (UK) »
Mine are from Essex, particularly Tillingham and Burnham on Crouch. So far they've used Moul / Moule / Moull / Mowl / Mowls / Mole... and probably more!
Transcribing Essex records for FreeREG.
Current parishes - Burnham, Purleigh, Steeple.
Get in touch if you have any interest in these places!