« Reply #52 on: Monday 08 February 16 16:34 GMT (UK) »
In some ways a frequently occuring name is better as it presents more of a challenge, therefore is more rewarding to research.
And (of course) easier to go up blind alleys ... 
You'd think so but I have an unusual name in my tree and it's caused me as much confusion as my Smiths have. When (if) I eventually untangle them I will be very satisfied.
Same here, with the never-ending variations of spelling of the name "Moul".... it's a fun challenge though 
I do like an unusual name as it gives more variety. Yeah my Maul clan have thrown up a variety of variants as well but that's part of the fun!

Where did yours come from?
Devon: Bibby, Bird, Chaplin, Davey, Littlejohns, Pope, Shire, Sloman, Tucker
Dorset: Gauler
Gloucestershire: Gauler
Hampshire: Kimber
London: Crump, Gauler
Middlesex: Crump
Monmouthshire: Brunt
Northumberland: Bibby
Somerset: Clarke, Dibble, Duddridge, Parsons, Pool, Poole, Shire, Silvester
Surrey: Clarke
Wiltshire: Gauler
GEDmatch (myself): A869547
GEDmatch (my maternal grandfather):A933749
GEDmatch (my maternal grandmother): NY7596565