Author Topic: Are there any surnames you definitely DO NOT want to find in your family tree?  (Read 8982 times)

Offline andrewalston

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,965
  • My granddad
    • View Profile
Re: Are there any surnames you definitely DO NOT want to find in your family tree?
« Reply #27 on: Saturday 06 February 16 17:59 GMT (UK) »
I have a JONES family from a village on the west side of Cheshire, alongside the welsh border. Luckily it is a VERY small village, with only room for one Jones family. Researching them was easier than I expected, once I got used to the illegitimacy. Unfortunately, Margaret never named the father, though I bet everybody in the village knew who it was!

When I found out that one of my gggggg grandfathers was a John SMITH, I realised I had a problem, especially as there were 3 John Smiths having children baptised in the 1750s in a small Lancashire village, and two of them were shoemakers. It put me off researching them for a while, and then I realised that I had not followed up John's wife. Within an hour I had traced her ancestors back to a marriage in 1588!
Looking at ALSTON in south Ribble area, ALSTEAD and DONBAVAND/DUNBABIN etc. everywhere, HOWCROFT and MARSH in Bolton and Westhoughton, PICKERING in the Whitehaven area.

Census information is Crown Copyright. See www.nationalarchives.gov.uk for details.

Offline jbml

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,457
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Are there any surnames you definitely DO NOT want to find in your family tree?
« Reply #28 on: Saturday 06 February 16 19:06 GMT (UK) »
No, although I sigh a little whenever I find out that Joe Bloggs married Ann Smith, which is most of my tree really. I'd like a few more unusual surnames around the place...

This is every genealogist's wish, Ayashi ... but there's a little fable behind it, too.

You see, once upon a time, Smith, Jones, Brown et al were VERY uncommon names. Whereas Kincardine, Timberlake, Venner, Marshalsea and Dufton were ten a penny. And it was much the same with given names, too ... the world was overrun with Ebeneezers, Nathaniels and Veronicas and had very very few Marys, Elizabeths and Johns.

Well, one day Nebuchadnezzar Whitesail was wringing his hands in despair at the never-ending list of Whitesail baptisms he had to trawl through, and in frustration he tapped his pencil on the microfiche reader three times. There was a blinding flash ... the fiche FINALLY came into proper focus ... and there before his eyes was the Genii of the Muniments.

"I am empowered to grant one wish to ever Genealogist," said the Genii, "But only one. Now, be very careful what you wish for ... you may want to think about it for a bit."

"Oh no," said Nebuchadnezzar, "I don't need to think at all. I know exactly what I need. I wish that all of my ancestors had rare names, and none of them had common names".

"Yes," said the Genii. "That's what they all wish for. IT IS DONE"

And the Genii disappeared.

So did all of Nebuchadnezzar's Whitesail and Venner and Timberlake and Huffington ancestors ... to be replaces by Browns and Smiths and Joneses and Thompsons ...
All identified names up to and including my great x5 grandparents: Abbot Andrews Baker Blenc(h)ow Brothers Burrows Chambers Clifton Cornwell Escott Fisher Foster Frost Giddins Groom Hardwick Harris Hart Hayho(e) Herman Holcomb(e) Holmes Hurley King-Spooner Martindale Mason Mitchell Murphy Neves Oakey Packman Palmer Peabody Pearce Pettit(t) Piper Pottenger Pound Purkis Rackliff(e) Richardson Scotford Sherman Sinden Snear Southam Spooner Stephenson Varing Weatherley Webb Whitney Wiles Wright

Offline pinefamily

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,810
  • Big sister with baby brother
    • View Profile
Re: Are there any surnames you definitely DO NOT want to find in your family tree?
« Reply #29 on: Saturday 06 February 16 22:01 GMT (UK) »
Change of name! No wonder I can't find them!  ;D

Referring to the topic, there are no surnames that I wouldn't want in my tree; connections to individuals is another matter. I would not feel comfortable finding a connection to some of the individuals named in this thread. Having said that, we all tend to agree that we take our ancestors as they are/were, the good the bad and the ugly.
I am Australian, from all the lands I come (my ancestors, at least!)

Pine/Pyne, Dowdeswell, Kempster, Sando/Sandoe/Sandow, Nancarrow, Hounslow, Youatt, Richardson, Jarmyn, Oxlade, Coad, Kelsey, Crampton, Lindner, Pittaway, and too many others to name.
Devon, Dorset, Gloucs, Cornwall, Warwickshire, Bucks, Oxfordshire, Wilts, Germany, Sweden, and of course London, to name a few.

Offline mogwood

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 77
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Are there any surnames you definitely DO NOT want to find in your family tree?
« Reply #30 on: Saturday 06 February 16 23:26 GMT (UK) »
Well, if I find another William Hawkins in my tree, I think I'll go drown myself   ;D  ;D

I've got 9 so far, over 2 generations, with 4 born within 2 years, all in the same village   :(

Actually, I'd quite welcome a Smith or a Jones - make a nice change .......


Offline a chesters

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,157
    • View Profile
Re: Are there any surnames you definitely DO NOT want to find in your family tree?
« Reply #31 on: Sunday 07 February 16 02:07 GMT (UK) »
Similar to andrewalston, I had problems with Turnbulls in Cumberland. Joseph married Mary, and Joseph married Mary. Sorting them out was rather interesting :o :o :-X :-X

Offline DavidG02

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,124
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Are there any surnames you definitely DO NOT want to find in your family tree?
« Reply #32 on: Sunday 07 February 16 02:24 GMT (UK) »
Must have been fun at family gatherings with all these Henry's and William's and Elizabeths and Sarah's running around :o :o ;D ;D
Well there was Harry and Hal , also Little Bill and Big Bill with Willy and William. Not forgetting Bess , Betsy and Lizzie Lilibeth if you were special. And Sarah and Sally with the occasional Sary for good measure. Why I know who they are :D

Oi William Henry you leave your little brother Big Bill alone
Genealogy-Its a family thing

Paternal: Gibbins,McNamara, Jenkins, Schumann,  Inwood, Sheehan, Quinlan, Tierney, Cole

Maternal: Munn, Simpson , Brighton, Clayfield, Westmacott, Corbell, Hatherell, Blacksell/Blackstone, Boothey , Muirhead

Son: Bull, Kneebone, Lehmann, Cronin, Fowler, Yates, Biglands, Rix, Carpenter, Pethick, Carrick, Male, London, Jacka, Tilbrook, Scott, Hampshire, Buckley

Brickwalls-   Schumann, Simpson,Westmacott/Wennicot
Scott, Cronin
Gedmatch Kit : T812072

Offline sami

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,905
  • Grannie M
    • View Profile
Re: Are there any surnames you definitely DO NOT want to find in your family tree?
« Reply #33 on: Sunday 07 February 16 02:25 GMT (UK) »

Actually, I'd quite welcome a Smith or a Jones - make a nice change .......

I don't know about that - I've got a William Smith marrying another Smith in a town of Smiths. At this point it seems hopeless - but I guess that's part of the fun ;)
England:  Archer, Bailey, Bates, Blower, Bosworth, Court, Hicklin, Orton, Palmer, Robbins, Sedgwick, Smith, Stevenson, Stone, Varnam, Wakelin, Walker
Canada:  Archer, Walker, Spencer, Shepherd
Australia:  Taplin
South Africa:  Risley

Offline pinefamily

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,810
  • Big sister with baby brother
    • View Profile
Re: Are there any surnames you definitely DO NOT want to find in your family tree?
« Reply #34 on: Sunday 07 February 16 09:26 GMT (UK) »
Two of my cousins, sisters, married a Smith and Jones respectively.  ::)
I am Australian, from all the lands I come (my ancestors, at least!)

Pine/Pyne, Dowdeswell, Kempster, Sando/Sandoe/Sandow, Nancarrow, Hounslow, Youatt, Richardson, Jarmyn, Oxlade, Coad, Kelsey, Crampton, Lindner, Pittaway, and too many others to name.
Devon, Dorset, Gloucs, Cornwall, Warwickshire, Bucks, Oxfordshire, Wilts, Germany, Sweden, and of course London, to name a few.

Offline clairec666

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,116
  • My great-great-grandfather in his signalbox
    • View Profile
Re: Are there any surnames you definitely DO NOT want to find in your family tree?
« Reply #35 on: Sunday 07 February 16 09:53 GMT (UK) »
We've all had moments like these..... you're tracing a female relative, you find a likely marriage for her, check the names on the same page, "Uh-oh, there's a John Smith, I hope she didn't marry him".... unless the other guy on the page is William Jones ;D
Transcribing Essex records for FreeREG.
Current parishes - Burnham, Purleigh, Steeple.
Get in touch if you have any interest in these places!