Author Topic: Barriers To Genealogy In The Future  (Read 31025 times)

Offline smudwhisk

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,866
  • Whiskey (1997-2018)
    • View Profile
Re: Barriers To Genealogy In The Future
« Reply #225 on: Friday 05 February 16 10:48 GMT (UK) »
JM I guessed you were refering to the counties of England as a whole, but obviously many people on RC live in the UK and will most likely know that "Home Counties" actually refers to a small part of England and not the whole of the country which would make the use of the phrase relating to the country in its entirely a little confusing. ;D 

Its also worth remembering that the Welsh parishes would also most likely have followed the same rules as the Church of England, although obvously in the case of the Welsh non-conformist chapels the rules would have been different.

That said, its a fair point that in the Common Room we all need to remember to ensure we qualify posts refering to a specific area in these circumstances as rules and regulations vary from country to country.
(KENT) Lingwell, Rayment (BUCKS) Read, Hutchins (SRY) Costin, Westbrook (DOR) Gibbs, Goreing (DUR) Green (ESX) Rudland, Malden, Rouse, Boosey (FIFE) Foulis, Russell (NFK) Johnson, Farthing, Purdy, Barsham (GLOS) Collett, Morris, Freebury, May, Kirkman (HERTS) Winchester, Linford (NORTHANTS) Bird, Brimley, Chater, Wilford, Read, Chapman, Jeys, Marston, Lumley (WILTS) Arden, Whatley, Batson, Gleed, Greenhill (SOM) Coombs, Watkins (RUT) Stafford (BERKS) Sansom, Angel, Young, Stratton, Weeks, Day

Offline majm

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,385
  • NSW 1806 Bowman Flag Ecce signum.
    • View Profile
Re: Barriers To Genealogy In The Future
« Reply #226 on: Friday 05 February 16 11:05 GMT (UK) »
So, perhaps there's hope that in 2116 that Genealogists will continue to enjoy finding out the various admin processes that prevailed at the time their 2016 ancestors were alive.   I have living relatives (first cousins, all born in NSW) around the globe working in (at last count) 17 different jurisdictions.  Some have settled there, some are FIFO workers, and some are considering settling in those 'foreign' lands.  Some have children born 'overseas'. 

To me, it is up to the family history buffs of that era to determine how they interpret the records they find, just as it is up to each one of us to determine how we interpret what records we find and to always strive to enjoy the hobby.

Cheers,  JM.   
The information in my posts is provided for academic and non-commercial research purposes. 
Random Acts of Kindness Given Freely are never Worthless for they are Priceless.
Qui scit et non docet.    Qui docet et non vivit.    Qui nescit et non interrogat.   
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
I do not have a face book or a twitter account.

Offline majm

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,385
  • NSW 1806 Bowman Flag Ecce signum.
    • View Profile
Re: Barriers To Genealogy In The Future
« Reply #227 on: Friday 05 February 16 11:07 GMT (UK) »
Yes, well put smudwhisk,  and in Australia the rules and regulations vary across at least eight different jurisdictions.   ;D

Cheers,  JM
The information in my posts is provided for academic and non-commercial research purposes. 
Random Acts of Kindness Given Freely are never Worthless for they are Priceless.
Qui scit et non docet.    Qui docet et non vivit.    Qui nescit et non interrogat.   
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
I do not have a face book or a twitter account.

Offline Andrew Tarr

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,012
  • Wanted: Charles Percy Liversidge
    • View Profile
Re: Barriers To Genealogy In The Future
« Reply #228 on: Friday 05 February 16 12:36 GMT (UK) »
Yes, well put smudwhisk,  and in Australia the rules and regulations vary across at least eight different jurisdictions.   ;D 

As, I believe, do the railway gauges?  That must make for some inconvenience - or have things changed?
Tarr, Tydeman, Liversidge, Bartlett, Young


Offline Andrew Tarr

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,012
  • Wanted: Charles Percy Liversidge
    • View Profile
Re: Barriers To Genealogy In The Future
« Reply #229 on: Friday 05 February 16 12:39 GMT (UK) »
That said, its a fair point that in the Common Room we all need to remember to ensure we qualify posts refering to a specific area in these circumstances as rules and regulations vary from country to country.

As a 'new boy' I learnt quite quickly that there is a wide range of viewpoints among RCs, and a fairly large contingent from the southern hemisphere.  But having learnt that, I think it could become tedious if every post had to have caveats inserted.  It's more useful to know easily which patch contributors belong to.  It's often clear, but not always.
Tarr, Tydeman, Liversidge, Bartlett, Young

Offline Guy Etchells

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 4,632
    • View Profile
Re: Barriers To Genealogy In The Future
« Reply #230 on: Friday 05 February 16 13:41 GMT (UK) »

To me, it is up to the family history buffs of that era to determine how they interpret the records they find, just as it is up to each one of us to determine how we interpret what records we find and to always strive to enjoy the hobby.

Cheers,  JM.   

Yes, quite so that I would imagine will always be a basic requirement.

Cheers
Guy
http://anguline.co.uk/Framland/index.htm   The site that gives you facts not promises!
http://burial-inscriptions.co.uk Tombstones & Monumental Inscriptions.

As we have gained from the past, we owe the future a debt, which we pay by sharing today.

Offline smudwhisk

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,866
  • Whiskey (1997-2018)
    • View Profile
Re: Barriers To Genealogy In The Future
« Reply #231 on: Friday 05 February 16 17:05 GMT (UK) »
That said, its a fair point that in the Common Room we all need to remember to ensure we qualify posts refering to a specific area in these circumstances as rules and regulations vary from country to country.

As a 'new boy' I learnt quite quickly that there is a wide range of viewpoints among RCs, and a fairly large contingent from the southern hemisphere.  But having learnt that, I think it could become tedious if every post had to have caveats inserted.  It's more useful to know easily which patch contributors belong to.  It's often clear, but not always.

Probably not clear from my post, but I would suggest that it really depends on the discussion subject matter and not really necessary all the time.  In any case, as many of us have surname interests at the bottom of the posts with places, its often easy to work out where many are located.
(KENT) Lingwell, Rayment (BUCKS) Read, Hutchins (SRY) Costin, Westbrook (DOR) Gibbs, Goreing (DUR) Green (ESX) Rudland, Malden, Rouse, Boosey (FIFE) Foulis, Russell (NFK) Johnson, Farthing, Purdy, Barsham (GLOS) Collett, Morris, Freebury, May, Kirkman (HERTS) Winchester, Linford (NORTHANTS) Bird, Brimley, Chater, Wilford, Read, Chapman, Jeys, Marston, Lumley (WILTS) Arden, Whatley, Batson, Gleed, Greenhill (SOM) Coombs, Watkins (RUT) Stafford (BERKS) Sansom, Angel, Young, Stratton, Weeks, Day

Offline pinefamily

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,810
  • Big sister with baby brother
    • View Profile
Re: Barriers To Genealogy In The Future
« Reply #232 on: Friday 05 February 16 20:51 GMT (UK) »
Yes, well put smudwhisk,  and in Australia the rules and regulations vary across at least eight different jurisdictions.   ;D 

As, I believe, do the railway gauges?  That must make for some inconvenience - or have things changed?
There is now a standard gauge across Australia for goods trains, and interstate trains. Regarding each state's rail network, I can't say. Nothing like the Lynton and Barnstaple Railway of course.  ;)
I am Australian, from all the lands I come (my ancestors, at least!)

Pine/Pyne, Dowdeswell, Kempster, Sando/Sandoe/Sandow, Nancarrow, Hounslow, Youatt, Richardson, Jarmyn, Oxlade, Coad, Kelsey, Crampton, Lindner, Pittaway, and too many others to name.
Devon, Dorset, Gloucs, Cornwall, Warwickshire, Bucks, Oxfordshire, Wilts, Germany, Sweden, and of course London, to name a few.

Offline jaybelnz

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,762
  • My Runaway Bride! Thanks to Paula Too!
    • View Profile
Re: Barriers To Genealogy In The Future
« Reply #233 on: Friday 05 February 16 21:04 GMT (UK) »
Andrew, most people have their location on their profile, as you do!
"We analyse the evidence to draw a conclusion. The better the sources and information, the stronger the evidence, which leads to a reliable conclusion!" Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk.

MATHEWS, Ireland, England, USA & Canada, NZ
FLEMING,   Ireland
DUNNELL,  England
PAULSON,  England
DOUGLAS, Scotland, Ireland, NZ
WALKER,   Scotland
WATSON,  England, Ayrshire, Scotland, NZ
McAUGHTRIE, Ayrshire, Scotland, NZ
MASON,     Scotland, England, NZ
& Connections