Author Topic: Barriers To Genealogy In The Future  (Read 31050 times)

Offline groom

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,147
  • Me aged 3. Tidied up thanks to Wiggy.
    • View Profile
Re: Barriers To Genealogy In The Future
« Reply #153 on: Tuesday 02 February 16 13:12 GMT (UK) »

The obvious example in the context of Family History is the number of girls who get 'up the spout' despite being instructed how to avoid it ?

I think that is a rather derogatory remark Andrew.

I agree with you majm - I find that rather offensive, not only the phrase used but also the idea. I was under the impression that it took two to make a baby, so why place the blame on the female? Surely the male could also have taken steps to avoid it!
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline majm

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,385
  • NSW 1806 Bowman Flag Ecce signum.
    • View Profile
Re: Barriers To Genealogy In The Future
« Reply #154 on: Tuesday 02 February 16 13:19 GMT (UK) »
Yes, 3sd,  it is offensive.   

French letters have been around for centuries, both as a method of birth control for males, and as a barrier to sexually transmitted diseases.   

Cheers,  JM
The information in my posts is provided for academic and non-commercial research purposes. 
Random Acts of Kindness Given Freely are never Worthless for they are Priceless.
Qui scit et non docet.    Qui docet et non vivit.    Qui nescit et non interrogat.   
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
I do not have a face book or a twitter account.

Offline jaybelnz

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,762
  • My Runaway Bride! Thanks to Paula Too!
    • View Profile
Re: Barriers To Genealogy In The Future
« Reply #155 on: Tuesday 02 February 16 13:35 GMT (UK) »
I agree. I find that remark very offensive as well Andrew, and not at all acceptable!
"We analyse the evidence to draw a conclusion. The better the sources and information, the stronger the evidence, which leads to a reliable conclusion!" Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk.

MATHEWS, Ireland, England, USA & Canada, NZ
FLEMING,   Ireland
DUNNELL,  England
PAULSON,  England
DOUGLAS, Scotland, Ireland, NZ
WALKER,   Scotland
WATSON,  England, Ayrshire, Scotland, NZ
McAUGHTRIE, Ayrshire, Scotland, NZ
MASON,     Scotland, England, NZ
& Connections

Offline Guy Etchells

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 4,632
    • View Profile
Re: Barriers To Genealogy In The Future
« Reply #156 on: Tuesday 02 February 16 13:41 GMT (UK) »
Yes, 3sd,  it is offensive.   

French letters have been around for centuries, both as a method of birth control for males, and as a barrier to sexually transmitted diseases.   

Cheers,  JM

Sorry but one could claim that to use the slang term French letters could be construed as derogatory as it insults the publication company French Letters (Les Lettres Françaises) which was formed in 1941 or  the song French Letters recorded in 1982 by the New Zealand band Herbs.

The term up the spout (and similar) has been used certainly since 1918 as slang for pregnant.

Perhaps we should not be too sensitive or judgemental when we read what others write.
Cheers
Guy


 
http://anguline.co.uk/Framland/index.htm   The site that gives you facts not promises!
http://burial-inscriptions.co.uk Tombstones & Monumental Inscriptions.

As we have gained from the past, we owe the future a debt, which we pay by sharing today.


Offline groom

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,147
  • Me aged 3. Tidied up thanks to Wiggy.
    • View Profile
Re: Barriers To Genealogy In The Future
« Reply #157 on: Tuesday 02 February 16 13:44 GMT (UK) »
Quote
The term up the spout (and similar) has been used certainly since 1918 as slang for pregnant.

Perhaps we should not be too sensitive or judgemental when we read what others write.
Cheers

As I said previously, although I don't like the phrase, it is also the idea that it is the woman's fault that I also object to. Did the man play no part in it?
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline 3sillydogs

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,832
  • Durban South Africa
    • View Profile
Re: Barriers To Genealogy In The Future
« Reply #158 on: Tuesday 02 February 16 13:45 GMT (UK) »
Why do us poor girls always get the blame, is it cos we can't hide the evidence if it all goes wrong, chap walks away and can even deny his responsibility if he so chooses, not really fair................. >:(


.........and pie fillings are hot when they come out of the oven Guy so that naughtly boys like you will hopefully learn not to pinch them until they're ready ::) ;D

.....but unfortunately I fear it is a lesson never learned, my son still pinches the hot biccies right off the tray...............and he's grown,............... :-\ ;D ;D
Paylet, Pallatt, Morris (Russia, UK) Burke, Hillery, Page, Rumsey, Stevens, Tyne/Thynne(UK)  Landman, van Rooyen, Tyne, Stevens, Rumsey, Visagie, Nell (South Africa)

Offline jaybelnz

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,762
  • My Runaway Bride! Thanks to Paula Too!
    • View Profile
Re: Barriers To Genealogy In The Future
« Reply #159 on: Tuesday 02 February 16 13:51 GMT (UK) »
I have the right to be offended and will always choose to be so if and when I read a misogynistic remark in a forum such as this, where I certainly would not expect to see such a thing!


Modified to add
"Perhaps we should not be too sensitive or judgemental when we read what others write."
Cheers
Guy

"We analyse the evidence to draw a conclusion. The better the sources and information, the stronger the evidence, which leads to a reliable conclusion!" Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk.

MATHEWS, Ireland, England, USA & Canada, NZ
FLEMING,   Ireland
DUNNELL,  England
PAULSON,  England
DOUGLAS, Scotland, Ireland, NZ
WALKER,   Scotland
WATSON,  England, Ayrshire, Scotland, NZ
McAUGHTRIE, Ayrshire, Scotland, NZ
MASON,     Scotland, England, NZ
& Connections

Offline Guy Etchells

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 4,632
    • View Profile
Re: Barriers To Genealogy In The Future
« Reply #160 on: Tuesday 02 February 16 14:01 GMT (UK) »
I have the right to be offended and will always choose to be so if and when I read a misogynistic remark in a forum such as this, where I certainly would not expect to see such a thing!

How is it misogynistic?
There was no hatred or mistrust of women in the remark.
Misogynist - Greek from the prefix miso- "hatred" plus gynḗ "a woman."

The phrase was simply slang phrase used daily up and down the country with no ill intentions.

Cheers
Guy


http://anguline.co.uk/Framland/index.htm   The site that gives you facts not promises!
http://burial-inscriptions.co.uk Tombstones & Monumental Inscriptions.

As we have gained from the past, we owe the future a debt, which we pay by sharing today.

Offline KGarrad

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,783
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Barriers To Genealogy In The Future
« Reply #161 on: Tuesday 02 February 16 14:16 GMT (UK) »
Laying the blame for pregnancy on either party, when you have no idea as to what really happened, is bad thinking!

I should explain that I got my first wife pregnant, before marriage, when she was just 17 years old!

I have never blamed anyone else but myself.
Well I was 24 at the time!! :o

On the plus side - we had 20 years of marriage, and 2 beautiful daughters! ;D

But please don't make comments about such things, unless you know the whole story!
The poor girl may have been raped, for all you know!
Garrad (Suffolk, Essex, Somerset), Crocker (Somerset), Vanstone (Devon, Jersey), Sims (Wiltshire), Bridger (Kent)