Author Topic: The dreaded change of Ancestry  (Read 33577 times)

Offline StevieSteve

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,679
    • View Profile
Re: The dreaded change of Ancestry
« Reply #99 on: Saturday 19 December 15 20:28 GMT (UK) »
Groom, really, I agree with you on this
Middlesex: KING,  MUMFORD, COOK, ROUSE, GOODALL, BROWN
Oxford: MATTHEWS, MOSS
Kent: SPOONER, THOMAS, KILLICK, COLLINS
Cambs: PRIGG, LEACH
Hants: FOSTER
Montgomery: BREES
Surrey: REEVE

Offline Speedway ace

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 175
    • View Profile
Re: The dreaded change of Ancestry
« Reply #100 on: Tuesday 22 December 15 13:18 GMT (UK) »
In the second quarter of 2014 Ancestry lost 52,000 customers, I suggest this trend will continue, The new 'Ancestry' has gained few friends,  The new Christmas i-phone customers will soon get bored after 10 minutes and their free trials will not be extended.

Nigel
Plankney, Copcott, Hampton, Crant, Johnson Baynham, Lyghtfote, Southwick, Legate and others in England & Calais (France)

Offline Hampshire Lass

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,359
    • View Profile
Re: The dreaded change of Ancestry
« Reply #101 on: Tuesday 22 December 15 13:23 GMT (UK) »
Well I've had a reply from Ancestry to my enquiry about the facility to show relationship to the home person on a tree.

They said they are working on this and it will be re-instated.

On looking at my trees today I find that the relationship is now automatically displayed in the usual area under their name. I believe this has improved because it now automatically shows everyone's relationship to you, without having to click to discover it. Also if you click on the relationship it opens a new list explaining the route to this relationship through all the generations.

So..... thank you Ancestry  :)

Best wishes HL


Census information is crown copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline groom

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,147
  • Me aged 3. Tidied up thanks to Wiggy.
    • View Profile
Re: The dreaded change of Ancestry
« Reply #102 on: Tuesday 22 December 15 13:28 GMT (UK) »
Well I've had a reply from Ancestry to my enquiry about the facility to show relationship to the home person on a tree.

They said they are working on this and it will be re-instated.

On looking at my trees today I find that the relationship is now automatically displayed in the usual area under their name. I believe this has improved because it now automatically shows everyone's relationship to you, without having to click to discover it. Also if you click on the relationship it opens a new list explaining the route to this relationship through all the generations.

So..... thank you Ancestry  :)

Mine's back as well, and I agree, it is much better and easier the way they show it now. I'm still discovering new things about the site and although I find it strange at the moment, I can't say that I dislike it enough to stop subscribing to Ancestry.
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline Hampshire Lass

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,359
    • View Profile
Re: The dreaded change of Ancestry
« Reply #103 on: Tuesday 22 December 15 13:36 GMT (UK) »
It is considerably different groom but I truly like it. Trust me to be in the minority!!!

I'm finding it easy to add people and so far my searches have produced relevant results.

Perhaps it's just luck but so far so good.
Best wishes HL


Census information is crown copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline ThrelfallYorky

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,669
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The dreaded change of Ancestry
« Reply #104 on: Tuesday 22 December 15 16:04 GMT (UK) »
Perhaps "they" might listen to a few more of our gripes, and change features back - I've, thankfully, no visual impairment, but I find that colour scheme fussy and unpleasant.
I've tried to remove or diminish most of the things I don't like about the site now, but I'm seriously feeling "If it wasn't broken, then why fix it?"
When you type in a search, a heck of a lot of names thrown up ... or at you ... seem to me VERY random!
I ranged through the comments, and thought "If that was M & S, or any other retailer, they'd be backpedalling like made, because of losing customers". It's a real pity, because I did like the site, and the way it used to work was fine. Why can't "they" let us stick with that, if we want?
Threlfall (Southport), Isherwood (lancs & Canada), Newbould + Topliss(Derby), Keating & Cummins (Ireland + lancs), Fisher, Strong& Casson (all Cumberland) & Downie & Bowie, Linlithgow area Scotland . Also interested in Leigh& Burrows,(Lancashire) Griffiths (Shropshire & lancs), Leaver (Lancs/Yorks) & Anderson(Cumberland and very elusive)

Offline jaybelnz

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,762
  • My Runaway Bride! Thanks to Paula Too!
    • View Profile
Re: The dreaded change of Ancestry
« Reply #105 on: Tuesday 22 December 15 22:20 GMT (UK) »
Well I'm still really struggling with all of it, and that's really disappointing!  But I gotta keep going with it - so keep on keeping on!  It was all so simple to navigate through before, but now simply frustrating!  I'm not a happy Chappy at all in regard to the changes   :-\

But apart from that??  Life is beautiful! 😃

"We analyse the evidence to draw a conclusion. The better the sources and information, the stronger the evidence, which leads to a reliable conclusion!" Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk.

MATHEWS, Ireland, England, USA & Canada, NZ
FLEMING,   Ireland
DUNNELL,  England
PAULSON,  England
DOUGLAS, Scotland, Ireland, NZ
WALKER,   Scotland
WATSON,  England, Ayrshire, Scotland, NZ
McAUGHTRIE, Ayrshire, Scotland, NZ
MASON,     Scotland, England, NZ
& Connections

Offline dolly dimples

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 656
  • I've not edited my PROFILE yet
    • View Profile
Re: The dreaded change of Ancestry
« Reply #106 on: Tuesday 22 December 15 22:39 GMT (UK) »
Ive just cancelled my longstanding membership with Ancestry tonight. I never did like the search system, There is no need to give numerous names, places, et'c  that are not even remotely connected to the search..
  I told Ancestry in my comment's that it is simply to get members to renew and renew their membership for ever!
 I am looking at find my past, so would welcome any pros and cons on that please, but I suspect they will give me as many headaches as Ancestry has ...   Dolly
Northumberland. Main.Hertfordshire.Brash.Dryden
East Lothian.Brash. Dryden. Cumberland.Henderson.Joyce.
Plymouth.Charlick. Canada.Boulds.

Offline groom

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,147
  • Me aged 3. Tidied up thanks to Wiggy.
    • View Profile
Re: The dreaded change of Ancestry
« Reply #107 on: Tuesday 22 December 15 22:54 GMT (UK) »
There are many threads on here comparing Ancestry and FindMyPast. It really depends what you are looking for, as each have different records eg I like Ancestry for my London Ancestors, but I sometimes find FindMyPast better for census.

It wasn't that long ago that people were complaining about changes on FindMyPast I believe!
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk