Author Topic: 1939 - what have you found?  (Read 29600 times)

Offline StevieSteve

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,679
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 - what have you found?
« Reply #126 on: Saturday 23 January 16 20:11 GMT (UK) »
No guarantees but try using * in the surname field
Middlesex: KING,  MUMFORD, COOK, ROUSE, GOODALL, BROWN
Oxford: MATTHEWS, MOSS
Kent: SPOONER, THOMAS, KILLICK, COLLINS
Cambs: PRIGG, LEACH
Hants: FOSTER
Montgomery: BREES
Surrey: REEVE

Offline Sloe Gin

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,442
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 - what have you found?
« Reply #127 on: Saturday 23 January 16 20:20 GMT (UK) »
Thanks. 
UK census content is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk  Transcriptions are my own.

Offline Alders

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 487
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 - what have you found?
« Reply #128 on: Thursday 28 January 16 18:05 GMT (UK) »
Does any one know why the register would be amended? Probably a really simple reason, just this simple person does not know it yet!  :P

the entry is as follows
Phyllis    Butterfield   28 Dec 1910   Female   Burler & Minder Worsted Good   Single
then in different writing Butterfield is crossed out & Smith added with the date 30.12.47 KBA.M

Is this checking to find out if the person is deceased?
Byrne, Butterfield, Gilbert, Sutcliffe, Furey, Alderson, Warham, to name a few!

Offline rosie99

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 43,925
  • ALFIE 2009 - 2021 (Rosbercon Sky's the Limit)
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 - what have you found?
« Reply #129 on: Thursday 28 January 16 18:11 GMT (UK) »
Alders,

It ties in with this marriage
Dec 1947 
Butterfield    Phyllis   (spouse Smith)   
Smith    Walter       
Bradford    2b   159
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline Alders

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 487
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 - what have you found?
« Reply #130 on: Thursday 28 January 16 18:21 GMT (UK) »
Alders,

It ties in with this marriage
Dec 1947 
Butterfield    Phyllis   (spouse Smith)   
Smith    Walter       
Bradford    2b   159
Yes i saw this, is it normal to annotate the register with these details?
Byrne, Butterfield, Gilbert, Sutcliffe, Furey, Alderson, Warham, to name a few!

Offline rosie99

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 43,925
  • ALFIE 2009 - 2021 (Rosbercon Sky's the Limit)
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 - what have you found?
« Reply #131 on: Thursday 28 January 16 18:24 GMT (UK) »
I would think so.  It appears on the copies I have where they have married after 1939
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Guy Etchells

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 4,632
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 - what have you found?
« Reply #132 on: Thursday 28 January 16 20:05 GMT (UK) »
Alders,

It ties in with this marriage
Dec 1947 
Butterfield    Phyllis   (spouse Smith)   
Smith    Walter       
Bradford    2b   159
Yes i saw this, is it normal to annotate the register with these details?

Yes, the 1939 National Register was conceived as a register which would be updated as it was used as the basis for ration books and ID cards during WWII.
If a woman married their identity (surname) would change and the register had to change to reflect that.
In addition in the early years medical care was paid for by National Insurance which in the case of a married couple would often be paid for by the husbands N.I. payments as many wives in those days stayed at home to look after the children.
When the NHS came into being in 1948 it was financed though tax rather than contributions.
Other changes were also the trigger for amendments on the register, for example if step-children changed their name this might not be picked up by the system but when they left home if they also changed their doctor they would re-register. The registration would reflect the change of name on the 1939 Register.

Cheers
Guy
http://anguline.co.uk/Framland/index.htm   The site that gives you facts not promises!
http://burial-inscriptions.co.uk Tombstones & Monumental Inscriptions.

As we have gained from the past, we owe the future a debt, which we pay by sharing today.

Offline clairec666

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,116
  • My great-great-grandfather in his signalbox
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 - what have you found?
« Reply #133 on: Thursday 28 January 16 20:57 GMT (UK) »
I'm confused by the entry I've found for my grandfather:

Borough/District: Eastbourne C.B.
Surname: Hodges
First names: Gilbert B (Doris M)
Birth year: 1910
3 more people who are officially closed

Gilbert's wife was called Doris Maud, born about 1916, I'd imagine she's one of the closed records. Not sure who the other two are (there weren't any children from this marriage, so possibly lodgers?) And why is Doris's name transcribed as part of Gilbert's entry?

I've not looked at the image yet... waiting until later this year when Doris's record should be opened and I can get some more clues about what happened to her after the war.
Transcribing Essex records for FreeREG.
Current parishes - Burnham, Purleigh, Steeple.
Get in touch if you have any interest in these places!

Offline StevieSteve

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,679
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 - what have you found?
« Reply #134 on: Thursday 28 January 16 21:21 GMT (UK) »
My guess is that the entry for Doris has been corrected for some reason (eg a spelling mistake) with the correction straying into the line above i.e. Gilbert's entry and the transcribers have transcribed what they saw
Middlesex: KING,  MUMFORD, COOK, ROUSE, GOODALL, BROWN
Oxford: MATTHEWS, MOSS
Kent: SPOONER, THOMAS, KILLICK, COLLINS
Cambs: PRIGG, LEACH
Hants: FOSTER
Montgomery: BREES
Surrey: REEVE