Author Topic: Divorce in 1914  (Read 1835 times)

Offline Bookbox

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,281
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Divorce in 1914
« Reply #9 on: Saturday 14 November 15 10:57 GMT (UK) »
I think - don't know for sure - that Ancestry will have the same papers.

Ancestry recently updated their coverage of J77 to include cases up to 1914. The file at TNA will be the same as you see online.

Offline lisat

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 199
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Divorce in 1914
« Reply #10 on: Saturday 14 November 15 11:18 GMT (UK) »
Thanks Bookbox, I thought so. Didn't want to waste money duplicating things.
Thackwell, Weinberg, Pointon, Pringle, Staniforth, Dennis, Fitzgerald, Lilley,Bush, Ramus, Weber, Coatup-Liddiard, Hart, Collins

Offline modem

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 139
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Divorce in 1914
« Reply #11 on: Saturday 14 November 15 19:15 GMT (UK) »
My great grandfather divorced my great grandmother in 1918 on the grounds of her adultery. He was  a worker in a cement factory at the time. I obtained the divorce papers from TNA and according to them he was granted financial assistance with the divorce because he was a "Poor Person".

Offline lisat

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 199
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Divorce in 1914
« Reply #12 on: Saturday 14 November 15 19:51 GMT (UK) »
That's interesting. I found some info online that said from 1914 some legislation was introduced to do precisely that, making a divorce cost under £10, and thus making it more available for the poorer people. My husbands Jewish ancestor may have been better off than I reckoned, he states on the Divorce papers that he was a moneylender! Also, the corespondent was a furrier, so although they weren't aristocracy, they weren't really poor. Thanks.
Thackwell, Weinberg, Pointon, Pringle, Staniforth, Dennis, Fitzgerald, Lilley,Bush, Ramus, Weber, Coatup-Liddiard, Hart, Collins


Offline nanny jan

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,154
  • Russian John
    • View Profile
Re: Divorce in 1914
« Reply #13 on: Saturday 14 November 15 20:28 GMT (UK) »

When my 2xgt.aunt divorced her husband in 1903 she was also classed as a Poor Person ( In Forma Pauperis); she was a midwife.
Howard , Viney , Kingsman, Pain/e, Rainer/ Rayner, Barham, George, Wakeling (Catherine), Vicary (Frederick)   all LDN area/suburbs  Ottley/ MDX,
Henman/ KNT   Gandy/LDN before 1830  Burgess/LDN
Barham/SFK   Rainer/CAN (Toronto) Gillians/CAN  Sturgeon/CAN (Vancouver)
Bailey/LDN Page/KNT   Paling/WA (var)



All census look-ups are crown copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline stanmapstone

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,798
    • View Profile
Re: Divorce in 1914
« Reply #14 on: Saturday 14 November 15 21:23 GMT (UK) »
It is a common belief that you had to be wealthy to get a divorce after 1858,  the very poor could sue without payment of fees 'in forma pauperis' if they could prove their lack of means.  The real opening of divorce to all classes did not take place until the 1920s, with the extension of legal aid, and the provision of some local facilities.

In 1914 poor persons possessed of less than £50 (excluding clothes and trade tools) or a woman earning less than £2 a week, could be given the services of a solicitor and counsel without charge, providing that the out-of-pocket expenses of the solicitor and witnesses were paid. Eighty-eight did so that year. This effectively reduced the cost of a divorce to less than £10. By 1920 some forty per cent of divorces were thus assisted. The remainder normally cost about £50 to £60.

https://familysearch.org/learn/wiki/en/Divorce_in_England_and_Wales

Stan
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline lisat

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 199
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Divorce in 1914
« Reply #15 on: Saturday 14 November 15 21:31 GMT (UK) »
Very interesting Stan. I hadn't realised that.
Thackwell, Weinberg, Pointon, Pringle, Staniforth, Dennis, Fitzgerald, Lilley,Bush, Ramus, Weber, Coatup-Liddiard, Hart, Collins