Author Topic: 1939 Register up and running (Part 3)  (Read 41841 times)

Offline Guy Etchells

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 4,632
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register up and running (Part 3)
« Reply #108 on: Monday 16 November 15 19:05 GMT (UK) »
Better still, suggest that he comes on here.

Trystan

If he does come here (or if he is already subscribed here) I can tell him exactly where the two entries are he is looking for.

Cheers
Guy
http://anguline.co.uk/Framland/index.htm   The site that gives you facts not promises!
http://burial-inscriptions.co.uk Tombstones & Monumental Inscriptions.

As we have gained from the past, we owe the future a debt, which we pay by sharing today.

Offline BettyofKent

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,998
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register up and running (Part 3)
« Reply #109 on: Monday 16 November 15 19:08 GMT (UK) »
I've one family I would really like to find, but no matter what search terms I use, there is no sign of them.
I've even slogged through the road I thought they might be living in...nearly 400 households >:( ... to no avail, although I did find several marked as just Household, with no details on the preview. What on earth is the point of those?
KENT:
Stutely - Wittersham & Stone
Padgham - Wittersham
Wanstall - Northbourne
Taylor - Ringwould & Ash
Skinner - Deal
Bushell - Walmer
Spain - Walmer
Also
Schloss - Poland, Nottingham, Massachusetts & New Zealand.
Cohen - Birmingham

"Census information is Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov."

Offline LizzieL

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,991
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register up and running (Part 3)
« Reply #110 on: Monday 16 November 15 19:11 GMT (UK) »
I've one family I would really like to find, but no matter what search terms I use, there is no sign of them.
I've even slogged through the road I thought they might be living in...nearly 400 households >:( ... to no avail, although I did find several marked as just Household, with no details on the preview. What on earth is the point of those?

Might they be households where everyone is redacted due to being born after 1915 and not died before 1991
Berks / Oxon: Eltham, Annetts, Wiltshire (surname not county), Hawkins, Pembroke, Partridge
Dorset / Hants: Derham, Stride, Purkiss, Sibley
Yorkshire: Pottage, Carr, Blackburn, Depledge
Sussex: Goodyer, Christopher, Trevatt
Lanark: Scott (soldier went to Jersey CI)
Jersey: Fowler, Huelin, Scott

Offline clairec666

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,116
  • My great-great-grandfather in his signalbox
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register up and running (Part 3)
« Reply #111 on: Monday 16 November 15 19:19 GMT (UK) »
Might they be households where everyone is redacted due to being born after 1915 and not died before 1991

Entirely possible... could be two yound newlyweds both born after 1916? Households where everyone is redacted will be uncommon, but not impossible.
Transcribing Essex records for FreeREG.
Current parishes - Burnham, Purleigh, Steeple.
Get in touch if you have any interest in these places!


Offline BettyofKent

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,998
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register up and running (Part 3)
« Reply #112 on: Monday 16 November 15 19:23 GMT (UK) »
That's a point, I suppose FindMyPast's system doesn't allow for these to be hidden. Having seen some Rootschatters say that they know people who are still alive who haven't been redacted, & some who died before 1991 who have been redacted I can't help wondering if my missing family have been victims of some sort of error &  are in one of these households.


I've one family I would really like to find, but no matter what search terms I use, there is no sign of them.
I've even slogged through the road I thought they might be living in...nearly 400 households >:( ... to no avail, although I did find several marked as just Household, with no details on the preview. What on earth is the point of those?

Might they be households where everyone is redacted due to being born after 1915 and not died before 1991
KENT:
Stutely - Wittersham & Stone
Padgham - Wittersham
Wanstall - Northbourne
Taylor - Ringwould & Ash
Skinner - Deal
Bushell - Walmer
Spain - Walmer
Also
Schloss - Poland, Nottingham, Massachusetts & New Zealand.
Cohen - Birmingham

"Census information is Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov."

Offline roopat

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,112
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register up and running (Part 3)
« Reply #113 on: Monday 16 November 15 20:33 GMT (UK) »
The address search lists the house numbers in the street, odd numbers first then odd numbers added later, followed by even numbers then even numbers added later.

Some additional addresses (those who did not respond to the registration at the time) were not added to this register but added to the later register these are not available.

Cheers
Guy

Thanks to the brilliant guidance on here, I was just able to check the addresses in Slaidburn Street, Chelsea. I'd expected to find my grandparents and other members of the family (they were mainly houses of multiple occupancy) - in 1934 my grandparents were on the electoral roll at number 45, although they had also lived at no 44. Checking the list of house numbers, all the numbers are consecutive but annoyingly stop at number 43 and resume at number 49.
So frustrating!
Guy, what am I missing this time? You've been so patient and informative, perhaps they would have been on the later register you mention, although I don't know why a run of houses would all have failed to respond.    ???

Pat
King, Richardson, Hathaway, Sweeney, Young - Chelsea, London
Richardson - Rayne Essex
Steward, Hindry, Hewitt - Norfolk, North Walsham area

Offline Guy Etchells

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 4,632
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register up and running (Part 3)
« Reply #114 on: Tuesday 17 November 15 06:33 GMT (UK) »
The address search lists the house numbers in the street, odd numbers first then odd numbers added later, followed by even numbers then even numbers added later.

Some additional addresses (those who did not respond to the registration at the time) were not added to this register but added to the later register these are not available.

Cheers
Guy

Thanks to the brilliant guidance on here, I was just able to check the addresses in Slaidburn Street, Chelsea. I'd expected to find my grandparents and other members of the family (they were mainly houses of multiple occupancy) - in 1934 my grandparents were on the electoral roll at number 45, although they had also lived at no 44. Checking the list of house numbers, all the numbers are consecutive but annoyingly stop at number 43 and resume at number 49.
So frustrating!
Guy, what am I missing this time? You've been so patient and informative, perhaps they would have been on the later register you mention, although I don't know why a run of houses would all have failed to respond.    ???

Pat


It could be that all the people in those houses are covered by the Data Prevention Protection Act, i.e. there are still thought to be alive.
See my answer number 102 in this thread.

Cheers
Guy
http://anguline.co.uk/Framland/index.htm   The site that gives you facts not promises!
http://burial-inscriptions.co.uk Tombstones & Monumental Inscriptions.

As we have gained from the past, we owe the future a debt, which we pay by sharing today.

Offline roopat

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,112
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register up and running (Part 3)
« Reply #115 on: Tuesday 17 November 15 07:26 GMT (UK) »
Thank you, Guy.

Yes, my mother and her siblings would be closed but my grandparents were born pre-1900 and old Granny Sweeney about 1875.   ;D

Just a blip I expect.....it's what I've come to expect from my family!

Thanks again for all your invaluable help.

Pat
King, Richardson, Hathaway, Sweeney, Young - Chelsea, London
Richardson - Rayne Essex
Steward, Hindry, Hewitt - Norfolk, North Walsham area

Offline weste

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,648
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register up and running (Part 3)
« Reply #116 on: Tuesday 17 November 15 10:35 GMT (UK) »
Managed to get my aunty's entry opened up who died a year ago. So will try some more entries.