1939 Register up and running (Part 2)

[Deirdre784]

Has something else changing as you can now get this on basic search result for a household:

Marjorie J    Fisk (Hazlewood)    1
Frederick W Hazlewood and 2 more people are on this record

It didn't used to give another name on the searches I have been doing.

I'm not getting another name 

[CarolA3]

Has something else changing as you can now get this on basic search result for a household:

Marjorie J    Fisk (Hazlewood)    1
Frederick W Hazlewood and 2 more people are on this record

It didn't used to give another name on the searches I have been doing.

I'm not getting another name 

I'm not getting another name either, just the number of other people in the household.  Also the full RG101/etc reference is still showing.  Nothing's changed on the Australian site as far as I can see

Carol

[dawnsh]

If you have access to facebook, check the visitors posts there.

Lots of comments about the numbers going, but FindMyPast say they are working on it.

Also posts about more than 1 name showing with internet explorer. I've checked and still only one name with internet explorer and firefox.

[smudwhisk]

I wonder if it depends on whether you logged in yesterday evening or today, as opposed to staying logged in all the time, or aren't logged in as you don't need to be in order to search on the data set?  I normally use IE11 and have been logged in all week and the preview is only showing one name and the ref.  I logged in on Firefox and it shows more than one name but no ref.

[Deirdre784]

Safari only showing the one name too, on iPad. No reference numbers.

[MerryM]

I have a question about the piece, item and individual numbers recorded for entries on the Register.

I've been looking at the household of Brian Redshaw in Hoddesdon R.D.

When FindMyPast were still including the identification numbers under the household information on the results page I noted the numbers for Brian Redshaw as 1616A/006/15. However the url for his entry is this:

http://search.findmypast.co.uk/record/locked?id=tna%2fr39%2f1616%2f1616a%2f05%2f15

The piece number and individual numbers are the same  - 1616A and 15, but the page number is 05 in the url not 006 as I originally noted. If I do a search on 1616A 05 with no other fields completed I get a list of 34 records but no Brian Redshaw. He still appears as part of 1616A 006.

Has this happened to anyone else? Can anyone explain what might have happened?

[Selina]

Hi MerryM

Brian Redshaw appears on 1616a 005 on page 2 the entry with just dashes for name (under the Paddick entry).  Clicking on the preview shows Brian Redshaw as also living there.

Selina

[MerryM]

Thanks Selina.

If I search page 1616A 05, look at page 2 and click the Preview on the blank entry under the Paddick entry the details for the Redshaw household show:

---- ---- ---- (the untranscribed person I clicked on)
2 more people on this record
1 more person who is officially closed

So how did you get his name to come up?

[Selina]

I seem to be one of the people who are getting a second name on an entry  but not the reference number, so he came when I clicked on the preview for the dash entry.

Selina