Author Topic: 1939 Register up and running (Part 2)  (Read 47560 times)

Offline bibliotaphist

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 578
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register up and running (Part 2)
« Reply #99 on: Thursday 05 November 15 17:04 GMT (UK) »
Has government (or anyone) ever published a list of NHS Letter prefixes in relation to where they were registered. I am a FJNJ.
I asked the National Archives on Twitter. They say it's planned.
https://twitter.com/UkNatArchives/status/661948361529040904

But then I found this. I don't know if it's the same thing... seems to be 3-letter rather than 4-letter codes.
http://www.findmypast.co.uk/articles/1939-register-enumeration-districts

For my "YALA" reference... "ALA" in the above list is Islington. Is YALA a subdistrict of ALA?

Confirmation of the above from TNA.

Quote
"Y means it is a replacement card (the original was lost or stolen) & ALA is the area code (Islington)"
https://twitter.com/UkNatArchives/status/662313982326349824

Offline bowman

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 289
  • Me in the woods 2004
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register up and running (Part 2)
« Reply #100 on: Thursday 05 November 15 18:27 GMT (UK) »
Hi, Having been in the same boat as has many others, ie incorrect name of my father, and I presume the myself, sister and mother, I contacted FindMyPast to be informed that I could use the option in the R/H corner of the preview page 'update the record' in order to amend said name, but this only gives options to open/close records or enquire about living people, no amendment choice at all.
 The other thing that I have found is information about events that happened much later is included, my mother remarried in 1956 after my fathers death 1953, her new married name is shown in the index with her maiden name shown as being that of my father, I asked FindMyPast about that and I have been told that this register has been with the NHS until 1991 until it relinquished it, and in their hands hundreds of thousands of names have been amended, and presumabley other info as well.
 I have found that it is more fruitful to search the road/street, if you know it, that way the whole neighbourhood appears, but again it is not much help if the name is not as it should be.
 I think FindMyPast are doing a disservice to their paying customers, not to include in their many blurbs about the '1939 Register', the fact that it also contains information that has been added in later years and that this could cause issues when researching it.
BEARD; BAKER; TAYLOR; SMITH: BEER

Offline suey

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,843
  • The light is on but there's no-one at home!
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register up and running (Part 2)
« Reply #101 on: Thursday 05 November 15 19:02 GMT (UK) »
I have just picked this snippet up from FindMyPast regarding transcription errors

Quote
On the transcription pages there is an error report button. If you're on the transcript preview can you please email the errors to support@findmypast.co.uk. Thanks

So you don't have to buy the record to be able to report mistranscription and would suggest adding the reference number from the free preview as well.

Thanks for this information.  I appreciate that some hands are more difficult to read than others but we do know our families.  When you see five members of one family listed and three have their surname spelt incorrectly in the transcriptions ie Smith becomes Simth or Sithm one does wonder what's going on :-\   
All census lookups are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Sussex - Knapp. Nailard. Potten. Coleman. Pomfrey. Carter. Picknell
Greenwich/Woolwich. - Clowting. Davis. Kitts. Ferguson. Lowther. Carvalho. Pressman. Redknap. Argent.
Hertfordshire - Sturgeon. Bird. Rule. Claxton. Taylor. Braggins

Offline ReadyDale

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 702
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register up and running (Part 2)
« Reply #102 on: Thursday 05 November 15 19:07 GMT (UK) »
The other thing that I have found is information about events that happened much later is included, my mother remarried in 1956 after my fathers death 1953, her new married name is shown in the index with her maiden name shown as being that of my father
I think women are indexed by the last surname held in the register, with previous names (since 1939) in brackets. There is no mention of maiden name - although in many (most) cases that is what it will be. However, if someone was already married in 1939, there won't be any reference to their actual maiden name.


Offline bowman

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 289
  • Me in the woods 2004
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register up and running (Part 2)
« Reply #103 on: Thursday 05 November 15 19:16 GMT (UK) »
Well Suey, I did just that only to get this reply:-

Thank you for your email
 
When you view the record, you will see an option ' Update The  Record'
 
If you click on that, the option to report a transcription error is in there.
 
 
 
 
With kind regards,


 Readydale, I expected the name to be as it appears on the register, not the supplementary info added years afterwards,for it to be included as it was at the time the register was compiled, if other family members are searching for this info and not aware of her remarriage, as many didn't.
BEARD; BAKER; TAYLOR; SMITH: BEER

Offline stephc

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 58
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register up and running (Part 2)
« Reply #104 on: Thursday 05 November 15 20:26 GMT (UK) »
" this register has been with the NHS until 1991 until it relinquished it, and in their hands hundreds of thousands of names have been amended, and presumabley other info as well."

I wonder if we can find any of the people who worked for the NHS back in the 70's/80's to comment on how they did the updating etc
Would have been an interesting job for someone that likes that kind of thing

Offline ReadyDale

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 702
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register up and running (Part 2)
« Reply #105 on: Thursday 05 November 15 22:30 GMT (UK) »
I expected the name to be as it appears on the register, not the supplementary info added years afterwards,for it to be included as it was at the time the register was compiled, if other family members are searching for this info and not aware of her remarriage, as many didn't.
I have just rechecked my great aunt, who also has three surnames in the register and she shows up if you search on any one of those three. So regardless of whether you were aware of her remarriage or not, whe would still be findable.

Offline suey

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,843
  • The light is on but there's no-one at home!
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register up and running (Part 2)
« Reply #106 on: Thursday 05 November 15 23:06 GMT (UK) »
I expected the name to be as it appears on the register, not the supplementary info added years afterwards,for it to be included as it was at the time the register was compiled, if other family members are searching for this info and not aware of her remarriage, as many didn't.
I have just rechecked my great aunt, who also has three surnames in the register and she shows up if you search on any one of those three. So regardless of whether you were aware of her remarriage or not, whe would still be findable.

One of my aunts is not findable under her maiden name.  They have her indexed under her full Christian name with her Christian name again in brackets and married surname.  I cross checked using the folio and piece no. and found her husband and the rest of his family so I know I have the right lady  :-\   Seems to be a matter of pot luck.

All census lookups are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Sussex - Knapp. Nailard. Potten. Coleman. Pomfrey. Carter. Picknell
Greenwich/Woolwich. - Clowting. Davis. Kitts. Ferguson. Lowther. Carvalho. Pressman. Redknap. Argent.
Hertfordshire - Sturgeon. Bird. Rule. Claxton. Taylor. Braggins

Offline MattD30

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,749
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register up and running (Part 2)
« Reply #107 on: Thursday 05 November 15 23:56 GMT (UK) »
PS

I don't have a subscription to Findmypast and don't want to keep paying for credits or take a subscription out. Is it possible to view these somewhere for free such as TNA, the library, or Society of Genealogists?

You can view for free at TNA. If you aren't going imminently, then see the bottom of my reply here

http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=734467.msg5799121#msg5799121

Many thanks for confirming that they can be viewed at TNA. I'm planning to go there on Saturday and have quite a long list of people to check.

Matt