Author Topic: 1939 Register up and running (Part 2)  (Read 47574 times)

Offline LizzieL

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,991
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register up and running (Part 2)
« Reply #36 on: Wednesday 04 November 15 15:33 GMT (UK) »

Names are George Henry Moore & Senta Moore expected to find them in either Kingston upon Hull or Ripon or Harrogate.


have you tried searching on date of birth? There are a lot of people transcribed as question marks.

could Senta have used a different name for registration purposes?
Berks / Oxon: Eltham, Annetts, Wiltshire (surname not county), Hawkins, Pembroke, Partridge
Dorset / Hants: Derham, Stride, Purkiss, Sibley
Yorkshire: Pottage, Carr, Blackburn, Depledge
Sussex: Goodyer, Christopher, Trevatt
Lanark: Scott (soldier went to Jersey CI)
Jersey: Fowler, Huelin, Scott

Offline LizzieL

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,991
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register up and running (Part 2)
« Reply #37 on: Wednesday 04 November 15 15:35 GMT (UK) »
Did Senta go to Canada in 1956?
Berks / Oxon: Eltham, Annetts, Wiltshire (surname not county), Hawkins, Pembroke, Partridge
Dorset / Hants: Derham, Stride, Purkiss, Sibley
Yorkshire: Pottage, Carr, Blackburn, Depledge
Sussex: Goodyer, Christopher, Trevatt
Lanark: Scott (soldier went to Jersey CI)
Jersey: Fowler, Huelin, Scott

Offline jillruss

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,824
  • Poppy
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register up and running (Part 2)
« Reply #38 on: Wednesday 04 November 15 15:45 GMT (UK) »
I've just watched a video on the 1939 Register on the National Archives website. This - and other sources - keep repeating that everyone was included and no one was left out.

I've searched over and over again for my 2 sets of grandparents, without success. I've tried likely addresses and, guess what, most of them don't appear on the searches.

My question is: human nature being what it is, there will obviously have been quite a few people who weren't 'caught' first time round but must have been caught up with or how did they get Identity Cards and ration books? Is there an appendix to the Register which lists these people or were they just swept up into the system 'as and when'?

In a way, I admire my family for avoiding the initial bureaucracy but I know they must have finally been accounted for - I still have my mother's identity card!

I've given up now - no point keeping looking for something that clearly isn't there!
HELP!!!

 BATHSHEBA BOOTHROYD bn c. 1802 W. Yorks.

Baptism nowhere to be found. Possibly in a nonconformist church near ALMONDBURY or HUDDERSFIELD.

Offline coombs

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,892
  • Research the dead....forget the living.
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register up and running (Part 2)
« Reply #39 on: Wednesday 04 November 15 15:51 GMT (UK) »
Could be some people were abroad or at the time of the register, or just grossly mistranscribed or even gave false info. I like the word enumerator when describing this register, the great substitute to the non survival of the 1931 census and no 1941 census taking place.
Researching:

LONDON, Coombs, Roberts, Auber, Helsdon, Fradine, Morin, Goodacre
DORSET Coombs, Munday
NORFOLK Helsdon, Riches, Harbord, Budery
KENT Roberts, Goodacre
SUSSEX Walder, Boniface, Dinnage, Standen, Lee, Botten, Wickham, Jupp
SUFFOLK Titshall, Frost, Fairweather, Mayhew, Archer, Eade, Scarfe
DURHAM Stewart, Musgrave, Wilson, Forster
SCOTLAND Stewart in Selkirk
USA Musgrave, Saix
ESSEX Cornwell, Stock, Quilter, Lawrence, Whale, Clift
OXON Edgington, Smith, Inkpen, Snell, Batten, Brain


Offline stanmapstone

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,798
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register up and running (Part 2)
« Reply #40 on: Wednesday 04 November 15 15:56 GMT (UK) »
Has government (or anyone) ever published a list of NHS Letter prefixes in relation to where they were registered. I am a FJNJ.

See http://blog.nationalarchives.gov.uk/blog/national-registration-day-29-september-1939/
and http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C2995124
Stan
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline jillruss

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,824
  • Poppy
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register up and running (Part 2)
« Reply #41 on: Wednesday 04 November 15 15:59 GMT (UK) »
Could be some people were abroad or at the time of the register, or just grossly mistranscribed or even gave false info. I like the word enumerator when describing this register, the great substitute to the non survival of the 1931 census and no 1941 census taking place.

Or not!!
HELP!!!

 BATHSHEBA BOOTHROYD bn c. 1802 W. Yorks.

Baptism nowhere to be found. Possibly in a nonconformist church near ALMONDBURY or HUDDERSFIELD.

Offline ReadyDale

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 702
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register up and running (Part 2)
« Reply #42 on: Wednesday 04 November 15 16:03 GMT (UK) »
I've searched over and over again for my 2 sets of grandparents, without success. I've tried likely addresses and, guess what, most of them don't appear on the searches.
Are you saying the people still don't appear at those addresses or that the addresses don't appear in the search?
If it is the latter, then you are not alone. I had to "Live Chat" FindMyPast, as an address I was searching for would not show up, but in going through the reference and adjusting the numbers (using the tips elsewhere on this forum), it turns out that the item (the sheet of about 40-50 individuals) was not on the system (confirmed by them), so would never have been found if I hadn't reported it. I have another one where I think the same applies, but haven't had the time yet to go through person-by-person comparing to the last previious electoral roll and a local map, to prove that is the case.
The guy from FindMyPast intimated that it wasn't an unusual occurance!

Offline bibliotaphist

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 578
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register up and running (Part 2)
« Reply #43 on: Wednesday 04 November 15 16:09 GMT (UK) »
Has government (or anyone) ever published a list of NHS Letter prefixes in relation to where they were registered. I am a FJNJ.

See http://blog.nationalarchives.gov.uk/blog/national-registration-day-29-september-1939/
and http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C2995124
Stan

Given the interest in WWII identity cards I'm surprised no-one's published a list of the area codes already. I wonder if TNA could be leaned upon to digitise and publish the enumerator's instructions http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C1926182 to the web?

From the looks of things, YALA* might have been a London code (see thread at http://www.GenesReunited.co.uk/boards/board/general_chat/thread/1313457). I know that my person did move to London during or after the War so perhaps this explains the re-registration. Maybe she moved there in 22.10.194[?] as the re-registration note suggests?

Shame the later additions to the register are not being made available.

Offline northern_rose

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 630
  • At least one of my ancestors was glamorous!
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register up and running (Part 2)
« Reply #44 on: Wednesday 04 November 15 16:15 GMT (UK) »
I've searched over and over again for my 2 sets of grandparents, without success. I've tried likely addresses and, guess what, most of them don't appear on the searches.
Are you saying the people still don't appear at those addresses or that the addresses don't appear in the search?
If it is the latter, then you are not alone. I had to "Live Chat" FindMyPast, as an address I was searching for would not show up, but in going through the reference and adjusting the numbers (using the tips elsewhere on this forum), it turns out that the item (the sheet of about 40-50 individuals) was not on the system (confirmed by them), so would never have been found if I hadn't reported it. I have another one where I think the same applies, but haven't had the time yet to go through person-by-person comparing to the last previious electoral roll and a local map, to prove that is the case.
The guy from FindMyPast intimated that it wasn't an unusual occurance!

i think I seem to be in the same situation with my grandparents - if I address search there appears to only be the odd numbers in the street listed and they lived at no 16!!
Wilson in the Lancaster area
Clegg in Todmorden
Adamson in Edinburgh
Miller in Edinburgh
Nunn in Norfolk and Co Durham
Smith in Glasgow
Haig in Peebles/Edinburgh
Also Nelson, Gardener, Garnett, Blair, Coleman, Aaronson and many more as the branches expand!

Census info is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk