Yes I've tried "other household member" with little success unless the surnames were rarer. In fact I've tried every field. In urban areas, street usually means street, but in rural areas the settlement name can come up there instead, and street names ignored. You might get addresses like 33 Little Walsingham. (My favourite is 1 Stank, near Barrow. Well, I know bathrooms were rare then!)
I think there needs to be some compromise here. I balk at the £25 fee to unredact someone - surely the army of family historians are doing FindMyPast a favour by enlarging the database, correcting mistranscriptions, all for free. (I accept transcribers can only record what they see).
For the 1911 I bought credits for near relatives, then a subscription when it was available. But my impression, so far, was that this census was much better transcribed - probably because they were reading householders careful neat handwriting rather than some overworked clerk's efforts.
