Author Topic: Possible nightmare for the future re DNA tracing  (Read 8249 times)

Offline Flattybasher9

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,364
  • Manners cost nothing, and are worth the effort.
    • View Profile
Possible nightmare for the future re DNA tracing
« on: Monday 26 October 15 12:17 GMT (UK) »
Interesting read

http://www.rootschat.com/links/01gcz/

Regards

Malky

Offline joboy

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,258
    • View Profile
Re: Possible nightmare for the future re DNA tracing
« Reply #1 on: Tuesday 27 October 15 08:41 GMT (UK) »
Hi Malky ........ you do find 'em ........... that really puts the cats among the pigeons  :o :o 
Gill UK and Australia
Bell UK and Australia
Harding(e) Australia
Finch UK and Australia

My memory's not as sharp as it used to be.
Also, my memory's not as sharp as it used to be.

Offline Guy Etchells

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 4,632
    • View Profile
Re: Possible nightmare for the future re DNA tracing
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday 27 October 15 08:47 GMT (UK) »
Not really DNA has never been able to prove paternity, there is always an element of doubt, it can however disprove paternity.

There have been many cases of DNA differences in samples taken from different areas of the body and many different reasons for the differences.

Cheers
Guy
http://anguline.co.uk/Framland/index.htm   The site that gives you facts not promises!
http://burial-inscriptions.co.uk Tombstones & Monumental Inscriptions.

As we have gained from the past, we owe the future a debt, which we pay by sharing today.

Offline joboy

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,258
    • View Profile
Re: Possible nightmare for the future re DNA tracing
« Reply #3 on: Tuesday 27 October 15 20:31 GMT (UK) »
Thanks Guy...... I am surprised that differences in DNA samples can be obtained from different parts of a body. :o :o
Have the samples been found to vary much? and does it put the whole field of DNA usage into doubt?
Joe .... who is now reflecting on his outlay on DNA. :'( :'(
Gill UK and Australia
Bell UK and Australia
Harding(e) Australia
Finch UK and Australia

My memory's not as sharp as it used to be.
Also, my memory's not as sharp as it used to be.


Offline brianoleary85

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 103
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Possible nightmare for the future re DNA tracing
« Reply #4 on: Thursday 05 November 15 11:30 GMT (UK) »
Thanks Guy...... I am surprised that differences in DNA samples can be obtained from different parts of a body. :o :o
Have the samples been found to vary much? and does it put the whole field of DNA usage into doubt?
Joe .... who is now reflecting on his outlay on DNA. :'( :'(

I wouldn't be too worried. YDNA and mtDNA testing would be unaffected by this quirk, and autosomal DNA testing - while giving a slightly different result - would still reflect DNA inherited from the same set of parents.

Offline philipsearching

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,094
  • I was a beautiful baby - what went wrong?
    • View Profile
Re: Possible nightmare for the future re DNA tracing
« Reply #5 on: Thursday 05 November 15 23:51 GMT (UK) »
Has anyone told Jeremy Kyle?  :P
Please help me to help you by citing sources for information.

Census information is Crown Copyright http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline joboy

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,258
    • View Profile
Re: Possible nightmare for the future re DNA tracing
« Reply #6 on: Friday 06 November 15 00:20 GMT (UK) »
Thanks Guy...... I am surprised that differences in DNA samples can be obtained from different parts of a body. :o :o
Have the samples been found to vary much? and does it put the whole field of DNA usage into doubt?
Joe .... who is now reflecting on his outlay on DNA. :'( :'(

I wouldn't be too worried. YDNA and mtDNA testing would be unaffected by this quirk, and autosomal DNA testing - while giving a slightly different result - would still reflect DNA inherited from the same set of parents.
Thanks Brian that is indeed comforting  :) :)
Joe
Gill UK and Australia
Bell UK and Australia
Harding(e) Australia
Finch UK and Australia

My memory's not as sharp as it used to be.
Also, my memory's not as sharp as it used to be.

Offline Redroger

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,680
  • Dad and Fireman at Kings Cross 13.7.1951
    • View Profile
Re: Possible nightmare for the future re DNA tracing
« Reply #7 on: Friday 06 November 15 11:49 GMT (UK) »
Not really DNA has never been able to prove paternity, there is always an element of doubt, it can however disprove paternity.

There have been many cases of DNA differences in samples taken from different areas of the body and many different reasons for the differences.

Cheers
Guy
There was a paternity case in the USA fairly recently where a woman had sex with identical twins within 24 hours. Wanting to prove the paternity of her child she arranged for tests to be taken.
The first result showed that there was a 1 in 10,000 chance this twin was not the father. Unfortunately, the test on the second twin gave the same result!! ::)
Ayres Brignell Cornwell Harvey Shipp  Stimpson Stubbings (all Cambs) Baumber Baxter Burton Ethards Proctor Stanton (all Lincs) Luffman (all counties)

Offline philipsearching

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,094
  • I was a beautiful baby - what went wrong?
    • View Profile
Re: Possible nightmare for the future re DNA tracing
« Reply #8 on: Friday 06 November 15 15:32 GMT (UK) »
Not really DNA has never been able to prove paternity, there is always an element of doubt, it can however disprove paternity.

There have been many cases of DNA differences in samples taken from different areas of the body and many different reasons for the differences.

Cheers
Guy
There was a paternity case in the USA fairly recently where a woman had sex with identical twins within 24 hours. Wanting to prove the paternity of her child she arranged for tests to be taken.
The first result showed that there was a 1 in 10,000 chance this twin was not the father. Unfortunately, the test on the second twin gave the same result!! ::)

OK, never mind Jeremy Kyle - send for Jerry Springer!
Please help me to help you by citing sources for information.

Census information is Crown Copyright http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk