Robert FROST of Barningham

[twiglet9]

Could anyone confirm a Barningham baptism please?
I have a note of a possible bap 25 Dec 1813 Robert, son of Thomas & Mary FROST (late Filby). Have I got the details correct? I think there were other children of the same couple bapt there too.
By 1841 Robert is still living in Barningham with Mary FROST, possibly his widowed mother, and a William Frost.

[ColC]

I cannot find the birth record but it would from the following appear to be correct.

1841 Pound Street, Barningham, Thetford, Suffolk

Mary   Frost   Female   67   1774   Suffolk
William   Frost   Male   30   1811   Suffolk
Robert   Frost   Male   27   1814   Suffolk
John   Frost     Next door   40   1801   All bricklayers


In 1851 Mary born Hepworth, William & John born Barningham are still there.
Also James born Barningham 1805 an Ag Lab.

ROBERT FROST, age 28 father Thomas married HANNAH BARBER, born 1818 father William. Garboldisham, Norfolk 19 Sep 1842

1851 Church Farm, Garboldisham, Guiltcross, Norfolk
Robert   Frost   Head   37   1814   Bricklayer Master   Barningham, Suffolk
Hannah   Frost   Wife   32   1819   -   Garboldisham, Norfolk,

Colin

[ColC]

THOMAS FROST married MARY FILBY 25 Nov 1792 Hepworth, Suffolk

Baptisms BARNINGHAM, parents Thomas & Mary Frost

MARIANNE 13 Jul 1794
SOPHIA 23 Oct 1796
SARAH 25 Dec 1798
JOHN 7 Dec 1800
HARRIET 14 Oct 1802
FANNY 10 Jun/Jul 1804
BETT 28 Jun 1807
WILLIAM 3 Feb 1811
MARY ANN 28 Jul 1815

Burials ST ANDREW, BARNINGHAM

THOMAS FROST born 1770, died age 69 burial 11 Jan 1839
MARY FROST born 1770, died age 95 burial 14 Oct 1865

Colin

[twiglet9]

Colin,

Many thanks, that's very useful and gives me several more clues to follow up.

Thomas's wife Mary (Filby) I had as probably dau of Isaac and Mildrid Filby, bapt 9 Feb 1771 at nearby Hepworth, so the marriage ties in with this.
 
It's a long while since I worked on these lines but I vaguely recall making the notes from a fiche copy of the original Barningham baptism register, many years ago now, at Bury Record Office. IIRC the images were faint and difficult to decipher over that section, which is why I'd marked it to recheck. I expect the old register pages were in a bad state.

Cheers,
Sue